You can use TyCon.tyConPrimRep, followed by primRepSizeW
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-
| users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Johan Tibell
| Sent: 06 December 2012 23:47
| To: glasgow-haskell-users
| Subject:
On 06/12/12 22:11, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
So are you going to add the two missing MachOps, MO_UF_Conv MO_FU_Conv?
I'm trying to add those. I'm now thinking that I will use C calls
(which is still much faster than going via
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
You can use TyCon.tyConPrimRep, followed by primRepSizeW
Looking at primRepSizeW I see that the only PrimRep that is bigger
than one word is Doubles, Int64s, and Word64s on 32-bit platforms.
Manuel (I think wisely)
I'm trying to see if this is reproducible, or it's just my machine.
I'm on a MacBook Pro (15-inch, Mid 2012), OS X 10.8.2, Haskell Platform
2012.4.0.0 (32 bit):
$ ghci
GHCi, version 7.4.2: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Loading package ghc-prim ... linking ... done.
Loading package
Hi Ron,
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:33:01PM -0500, Ron Alford wrote:
I'm trying to see if this is reproducible, or it's just my machine.
This sounds like
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7043
Thanks
Ian
___
Glasgow-haskell-users
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:15:06PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 06/12/12 17:04, Ian Lynagh wrote:
It's true that we do give e-mailing it as a (less preferred) way for
users to submit a bug on
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ReportABug
but I wonder if we shouldn't change that.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
You can use TyCon.tyConPrimRep, followed by primRepSizeW
Looking at primRepSizeW I see that the only PrimRep that is bigger
than one
