Hi Bertram,
Thank you for the explanation. My previous attempt obviously suffers
from the race condition you mention.
However it still seems to be possible to implement a compromise, using
both the IO manager and a new thread, i.e. forking only when the
computation is being timed out. The
On 25/02/13 18:05, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 06:38:46PM +0100, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
Ian Lynagh i...@well-typed.com writes:
[...]
If we did that then every package would depend on haskell2010, which
is fine until haskell2013 comes along and they all need to be changed
On 25/02/13 19:25, Johan Tibell wrote:
Hi all,
Let me add the goals I had in mind last time I considered trying to
split base.
1. I'd like to have text Handles use the Text type and binary Handles
use the ByteString type. Right now we have this somewhat awkward setup
where the I/O APIs are
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 04:54:35PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 25/02/13 18:05, Ian Lynagh wrote:
Personally, I don't think the language report should be specifying the
content of libraries at all,
It's not that straightforward, because the language report refers to
various library
Akio Takano wrote:
Thank you for the explanation. My previous attempt obviously suffers
from the race condition you mention.
However it still seems to be possible to implement a compromise, using
both the IO manager and a new thread, i.e. forking only when the
computation is being timed
