Hello all,
After a long week, I've finally gotten a little time to reply to
emails, and I mainly have one question I'd like to ask.
First, please direct your attention to this:
Hi Austin,
I ask this because my time to dedicate to GHC is a bit thin right now,
so you must help me decide what's important! So please let me know -
just a general vote in favor of doing it within some X timeframe (even
'real soon' or 'a week would be great') would be nice.
Would you give
I'm building the GHC-7.8 branch now, and will then kick off a Stackage
build. That should give a good indication if there are regressions.
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.comwrote:
Hello all,
After a long week, I've finally gotten a little time to reply to
I would say sooner. Here are still unmerged things that I think we could
merge before (i.e. easy to merge):
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9001
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9078
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8475
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8783
I believe #9078 affects all EDSLs that use Andy Gill’s stable name method to
implement observable sharing. It certainly crashes Accelerate.
I would very much appreciate if 7.8.3 would be released in time to make it into
the upcoming Haskell Platform. (If the platform would ship with 7.8.2.,
Hi!
It would be great if the patch I added on #9080 was put into 7.8.3 (well, I
guess someone has to commit it to master first).
Niklas
2014-05-27 10:06 GMT+02:00 Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com:
Hello all,
After a long week, I've finally gotten a little time to reply to
emails, and I
Hi Niklas,
Yes, that patch looks great, thank you. The only reason it wasn't
included in the list earlier was that the status was set to 'new', not
to 'patch!' I'm afraid this is perhaps the most critical aspect
necessary for me to recognize such tickets. I have marked it as patch,
and it can go
