On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 03:53:13PM +0800, Simon Hengel wrote:
> > Can you explain why this would not solve your usecase? i.e., why would
> > README.lhs.md not suffice?
>
> I haven't tried, but my assumption was that this is not picked up by
> GitHub.
I just verified, GitHub dose not pick up READM
.lhs = Literate Haskell
So maybe .mhs = Markdown Haskell instead of .lhs+md?
Jan
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Thanks. I don't have strong opinions about any of this. But I would love to
have an actual specification of what is proposed. The wiki page starts with
"Proposal" but lists a set of alternatives. Later "Concrete proposal"
discusses only file suffixes, and has lots of discussion of alternativ
