-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I'm replying to this to clarify that I object to GitHub in order to
have a clear conscience, not because I think GitHub is a "bad tool".
Attempting to shoot down my arguments against GitHub with arguments
for convenience or it being a "a good tool",
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 20/07/16 23:41, Jack Hill wrote:
> Would the barrier to entry to a non-GitHub system be reduced by
> using GitHub for user authentication/accounts
For what it's worth, GitLab supports this[0]. You can also use
Twitter, or whatever.
[0]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 20/07/16 19:04, Ben Gamari wrote:
> I know, it's rather frustrating. I also have fairly strong feelings
> about open-source purity, but in this case I just don't see any
> way to improve the current situation under this constraint.
I don't think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 20/07/16 19:00, Richard Eisenberg wrote:
> While I indeed sympathize with your desire to avoid proprietary,
> closed software, I'd like to point out that avoiding GitHub
> because it's closed has a real cost
I don't value those points over my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 20/07/16 11:36, Ben Gamari wrote:
> * What would you like to see changed in the proposed process, if
> anything?
No GitHub. In order to fully utilise GitHub, one needs to run
proprietary programs. Additionally, GitHub is proprietary software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 19/03/16 20:08, Evan Laforge wrote:
> The catch is that it uses qualified imports, which makes
> everything easy. If you're still interested, it's fix-imports on
> hackage. There are lots of others too, but I haven't tried them.
Ah. I generally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 18/03/16 23:51, Evan Laforge wrote:
> I did this about 5 or 6 years ago for vim, and I'm so used to it I
> wouldn't want to live without it.
Is your plug-in free software? Do you have a link to it? It sounds
very useful to us vim users.
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
David,
I think it would be more valuable to make a DOOM-like game than to
remake DOOM. Especially if you are going to aim for funding. The free
software community has had this problem for years, where we point to
remakes of old games as evidence to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 31/07/15 20:10, Evan Laforge wrote:
Come to think of it, shouldn't ghc include this, instead of
everyone creating their own shell scripts by hand?
I don't think so. This is usually done in the userland -- at least in
GNU+Linux distributions.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I like symmetry. +1 from me.
- --
Alexander
alexan...@plaimi.net
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17/10/14 00:40, Austin Seipp wrote:
Maybe there are some cases today where something like this could
happen, but this seems awfully, awfully implicit and hard-to-follow
as a language feature.
In general I think a program that has imports
11 matches
Mail list logo
