After a monstrous fight against the versionitis of jadetex and the
DocBook tools, I've finally managed to build the installation guide
and the user's guide. But there were tons of warnings like:
jade:/var/lib/sgml/CATALOG.docbk31:24:0:W: DTDDECL catalog
entries are not supported
Should
Or you can use OpenJade 1.3
(http://peano.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de/jade-cvs/), which I
think supports DTDDECL.
Oops, I take it back. The OpenSP 1.4 prerelease supports DTDDECL, but not
1.3, and OpenJade 1.4 hasn't been released in any form yet (except CVS).
--FAC
Since ghc-4.04 confuguration insists one has Happy v1.6, has this
actually been released? I see no link to it from the usually suspect
sites.
If it's Imminent, can a make the modest suggestion that it have a
standalone makefile in it? Having to slot it into a ghc source
build tree has
Please, do *not* put error correction into ghc! I think error correction
is one of the Classic Bad Ideas for a compiler. It's much better to
focus on providing understandable error messages: when the user knows
what the compiler thinks is wrong, it's usually not so hard to fix the
error.
[This question more properly belongs on glasgow-haskell-users, so I cc'd
there.]
Rory Leigh wrote:
Could you help me please; I'm looking to possibly be able to download
a Haskell compiler in as simple a way as possible (preferably without zip
files
-- if possible -- or if so,together with
IIRC, this has already been discussed quickly some time ago, but
anyway: To conform more with the rest of the *nix world and decrease
the confusion of my students, I'd like GHC to be less verbose by
default. IMHO the following messages should not be issued without
any commandline flags:
Has anyone created an IDL file for Xlib? Alternatively, has anyone created one for
H/Direct?
I know that someone is working on GTK, but I'm interested in Xlib specifically. Also,
I'm aware of Sigbjorn's Xlib interface in Haggis, but that one's reportedly still for
GHC 0.29. :(
BTW, it's not
Would it be asking too much to have Ross Paterson's syntax (or something close) for
John Hughes' arrows implemented in GHC 4.02? I'm dying to fool around with it.
--FC
I wrote:
First, a CVS question. I am a real CVS novice so bear with me.
I finally managed to use CVS to get the current 4.02 GHC
distribution (and to compile it! :). Now, I understand how
one can create recursive diffs between versions, but if I
understand correctly, not every change
First, a CVS question. I am a real CVS novice so bear with me.
I finally managed to use CVS to get the current 4.02 GHC distribution (and to compile
it! :). Now, I understand how one can create recursive diffs between versions, but if
I understand correctly, not every change counts as a
Simon Marlow wrote:
You should either compile the whole lot with -O, or not at all.
Really? What are the consequences if you don't? It doesn't lead to incorrectly
linked code, does it?
I can see that, even if you compiled module A with -O, and then tried to call some
functions of A from
When will 4.02 (by which I mean the next stable release) be released?
and
Will it be Haskell 98-compliant, or is that going to be in a
future release?
We'll try to put out a source release before Xmas. Why are you
interested? Scoped tyvars?
No, I just want a reliable compiler with
What is the status of the lastest release (3.01) with respect to Unicode
support? Is it possible to write source in Unicode? How wide are
characters? Do the I/O library functions support it? etc.
--FC
Under the "Getting GHC" heading on the GHC web page, version 3.00 is listed
as the most recent minor release whereas 2.10 is listed as the most recent
major release.
Is this an error, or is there something to the definition of minor/major
which I haven't caught on to?
--FC
14 matches
Mail list logo
