Re: Dynamic libraries by default and GHC 7.8

2012-11-27 Thread dag.odenh...@gmail.com
And on 32 bit Linux, which apparently is known to suffer from dynamic... Though from 20ms to 100ms is more than 30% penalty. On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:16 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > That was with GHC 7.4.1, I should add. I didn't measure overall

Re: Dynamic libraries by default and GHC 7.8

2012-11-27 Thread dag.odenh...@gmail.com
That was with GHC 7.4.1, I should add. I didn't measure overall performance difference, only the time to finish a command-line invocation. On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:11 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote:

Re: Dynamic libraries by default and GHC 7.8

2012-11-27 Thread dag.odenh...@gmail.com
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote: > This has some advantages and some disadvantages, so we need to make a > decision about what we want to do in GHC 7.8. > When I built my CLI app with dynamic linking, the time to run and complete a command went from 20ms to 100ms, which is part

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Executables got bigger using dynamic link.

2012-11-26 Thread dag.odenh...@gmail.com
You also need to enable executable-dynamic. On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Magicloud Magiclouds < [email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, I left the profiling option on, which seems to suppress the > dynamic options. > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Magicloud Magiclouds > wrote: >