disable" is necessary, sigh.
--Kazu
_______
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
blem on 9.4.1-rc1.
"xattr -rc ." and "make install" worked perfectly.
macOS Monterey v12.4
Xcode 13.4.1
--Kazu
_______
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
and in-kind support has
>> facilitated GHC maintenance and release management over the years.
>> Moreover, this release would not have been possible without the hundreds
>>
>> of open-source contributors whose work comprise this release.
>>
>> As always, do op
smoother experience at some fees/cost.
> On 2021-10-13, at 19:56, David Duke wrote:
>
> Thanks Steven. Looks like it might be something with my system.
> I reinstalled from macports 8.10.7
> @ Carter yes I've been carefully check the compiler version on each trial.
> However t
you meant: _hs_iconv_close)
> "_locale_charset", referenced from:
> _localeEncoding in libHSbase-4.14.3.0.a(PrelIOUtils.o)
> ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
>
> I've triedgiong through ghcup
>
> 8.8.4
> 8.6.5.
> 8.10.2
> 8.10.7
&g
so facto don't want to `show` anything in
consuming it. An `instance Foldable Tree` has no mechanism to pass in any such
dictionaries (which'll anyway be redundant, as you say).
_______
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
How could
we make that clearer?
Thanks
Simon
PS: I am leaving Microsoft at the end of November 2021, at which point
simo...@microsoft.com<mailto:simo...@microsoft.com> will cease to work. Use
simon.peytonjo...@gmail.com<mailto:simon.peytonjo...@gmail.com> instead. (For
now, it just
Message-
| From: Michael Sperber
| Sent: 18 August 2021 14:14
| To: Simon Peyton Jones
| Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: -dinline-check for symbolic names?
|
|
| On Tue, Aug 10 2021, Simon Peyton Jones wrote:
|
| > It's hard to tell what is happening w
tuple?
Not sure what you mean here, but once we have a repro case we can discuss.
Worth opening a ticket too -- email is easily lost.
Thanks
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Michael Sperber
| Sent: 12 August 2021 10:15
| To: Simon Peyton Jones
| Cc: Sebastian Graf ; glasgow-
sity.
If you would like to offer a patch for the user manual to explain this better,
that would be great.
Simon
From: Glasgow-haskell-users
mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org>>
On Behalf Of David Feuer
Sent: 08 August 2021 09:37
To: Anthony Clayden
mailto:anthony.d.clay...@gm
It's hard to tell what is happening without a repro case. Can you share one?
You suggested that it might have something to do with using an operator. Does
the same thing happen if you replace the operator with an alpha-numeric name?
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Glasgow-ha
plain this better,
that would be great.
Simon
From: Glasgow-haskell-users On
Behalf Of David Feuer
Sent: 08 August 2021 09:37
To: Anthony Clayden
Cc: GHC users
Subject: Re: InstanceSigs -- rationale for the "must be more polymorphic than"
To the best of my knowledge, `InstanceSigs
and open a ticket?
Thanks
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Glasgow-haskell-users On
| Behalf Of Michael Sperber
| Sent: 06 August 2021 14:06
| To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Avoiding construction of dead dictionaries
|
| [You don't often get
htly less efficient, but
things would be a bit more uniform. If there was a real advantage to doing
this, it'd definitely be worth measuring the perf cost (if any).
Simon
From: Glasgow-haskell-users On
Behalf Of Brandon Allbery
Sent: 09 August 2021 16:32
To: Tom Smeding
Cc: GHC users ;
itrary garbage in it
> for cheap?
newByteArray# does not actively clear memory.
However, for large arrays, I think the memory is likely to be freshly
allocated from the OS, and the OS will have cleared it for security
reasons.
Cheers,
Bertram
___
G
> ghc -O2 Crash.hs && ./Crash
[1 of 1] Compiling Main ( Crash.hs, Crash.o ) [Optimisation flags
changed]
Linking Crash ...
5050
482299980870
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
-}
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
ssage-
| From: Glasgow-haskell-users On
| Behalf Of Ganesh Sittampalam
| Sent: 05 August 2019 14:02
| To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: exhausted simplifier ticks and hs-boot files
|
| Hi,
|
| The code below (also attached - unzip and run go.sh) triggers the GHC
| panic "Simpli
ld like to work on that, I’d be happy
to help explain how the current machinery works.
Simon
From: Glasgow-haskell-users On
Behalf Of Anthony Clayden
Sent: 25 March 2019 11:50
To: GHC Users List ; Tom Schrijvers
Subject: Re: Equality constraints (~): type-theory behind them
> On Mon, De
Friends
As many of you will know, I have been concerned for several years about the
standards of discourse in the Haskell community. I think things have improved
since the period that drove me to write my Respect
email<https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell/2016-September/024995.h
making your views known to them.
Simon
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
approach seems
legitimate.
I always want code with unsafeCoerce to be clear about (a) why it’s necessary
and (b) why it’s sound.
Simon
From: Glasgow-haskell-users On
Behalf Of Conal Elliott
Sent: 24 May 2018 00:39
To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Subject: Natural number comparisons with
llenge
because beginners tend not to be vocal, and yet they are a crucial set of
Haskell users. Every Haskell user started as a beginner.
The title of this thread, “Open up the issues tracker on ghc-proposals”,
identifies a solution rather than a problem. Perhaps a constructive place to
st
are drafts that invite community discussion,
prior to submitting to the committee for decision.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Glasgow-haskell-users On Behalf Of Anthony Clayden
| Sent: 02 May 2018 02:34
| To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org; ghc-d...@haskell.org
| Subject:
in advance for your help/assistance.
A.S.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
_______
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
x27;d end up with
duplication.
Worth looking at #8809 and related tickets
S
| -Original Message-
| From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Joachim Breitner
| Sent: 06 March 2018 15:27
| To: GHC users
| Subject: How to highlighting
You'd need to add zonkCoreExpr in place of zonkEvTerm.
evVarsOfTerm is called quite a bit; you might want to cache the result in the
EvExpr constructor.
Make a ticket and execute?
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| boun..
rule you want, complete with
all its dictionary arguments. Can you do that?
Simon
From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org]
On Behalf Of Conal Elliott
Sent: 03 October 2017 01:03
To: Joachim Breitner
Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Subject: Re: GHC
Did you try -fno-specialise?
From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org]
On Behalf Of Conal Elliott
Sent: 15 September 2017 02:45
To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Subject: Inhibiting the specialiser?
Is there a GHC flag for inhibiting the specializer (but
dence can we use to cast False to 'a'.
In short, fundeps and type family dependencies only add extra unification
constraints, which may help to resolve ambiguous types. They don’t provide
evidence. That's not to say that they couldn't. But you'd need to extend
System F
do to make a reproducible case would be helpful.
-dshow-passes shows the size of each intermediate form, which at least
sometimes shows where the big changes are.
Simon
From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org]
On Behalf Of Alberto Valverde
Sent: 06 June
--Original Message-
| From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Yitzchak Gale
| Sent: 10 May 2017 13:56
| To: GHC users
| Subject: Unused import warning on re-export
|
| I have a module A with no export list, and a function f which from the
|
Thank you!
| -Original Message-
| From: Christian Höner zu Siederdissen [mailto:choe...@bioinf.uni-
| leipzig.de]
| Sent: 28 April 2017 00:14
| To: Simon Peyton Jones
| Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: join points and stream fusion?
|
| Sorry,
|
| with
w as poss).
Is this a regression? I.e. did some earlier version of GHC do better on the
exact same code?
Maybe open a Trac ticket.
Thanks
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Christian Höner zu Sied
Does the GHC compiler generate combinator terms/graphs of Haskell
programs? Combinator terms are often derived during compilation for
purposes of optimization by way of normal order graph reduction. But
does GHC output, e.g., as an option, a given Haskell program's entire
combinator
verlap complaint
here
Simon
From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org]
On Behalf Of Iavor Diatchki
Sent: 18 April 2017 01:50
To: anthony_clay...@clear.net.nz
Cc: GHC Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Why isn't this Overlapping?
Hello,
these two instances reall
that help?
S
From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org]
On Behalf Of Ranjit Jhala
Sent: 25 January 2017 00:09
To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Subject: Accessing the "original" names via GHC API
Hi,
I'm quite vexed trying to do the follo
[mailto:b...@smart-cactus.org]
| Sent: 29 December 2016 14:50
| To: Conal Elliott ; George Colpitts
|
| Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org; Simon Peyton Jones
|
| Subject: Re: GHC rewrite rules for class operations & laws
|
| On December 28, 2016 7:27:20 PM EST, Conal Elliott w
wanted to think through all this.
Simon
From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org]
On Behalf Of Conal Elliott
Sent: 17 November 2016 16:40
To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Subject: GHC rewrite rules for class operations & laws
Is it possible to apply
http%3A%2F%2Fmail.haskell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-devs&data=01%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cf4d41103efc4487796c708d3e59f3720%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=Ju37RVvZoNakCzz1dgTj%2F8mO9yz4ImbII14Hw%2FHWRpk%3D&reserved=0>
______
%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-devs&data=01%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cfed1bf51dcf744f68fcd08d3e56e903b%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=jwRX7Pxe62sp6xU2jmXyoAxHNzledV%2BPceCGW%2BxN%2FlQ%3D&reserved=0
_______
Glasgow-haskell-
:51
To: Simon Peyton Jones
Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org Mailing List
Subject: Re: Type families in kind signatures with TypeInType
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Simon Peyton Jones
mailto:simo...@microsoft.com>> wrote:
This is an example of https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/
===
type instance T List = []
Currently you have to write $(return []) to get the separator, but I think
we’ll add a special separator.
Simon
From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org]
On Behalf Of David Menendez
Sent: 23 September 2016 05
d to find a way to
annotate the Haskell source to tell our compiler to not mangle a name.
> What GHC does do is inlining and specialisation, which might optimise
> away your carefully constructed "primitive".
>
> What I do in this case, is simply mark my "primitive" fu
Sounds bad. But it'll need someone with bytestring expertise to debug. Maybe
there's a GHC problem underlying; or maybe it's shortcoming of bytestring.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| boun...@haskell.or
A colleague and i are writing, as an unofficial side project, a
Haskell→Bluespec compiler, using GHC as our Haskell front-end. The
source language of the part we are writing is GHC Core. We need to
somehow expose some Bluespec terms and types to the Haskell source
program. We had a few ideas:
1
I've added record construction and update to the syntax, which makes it clearer
how the other constructs are analogous to them.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Akio Takano
| Sent: 11
-
| 14d66cda32248456a5f223b6333c6132
| [5] https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs
| [6] https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals
_______
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
_______
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
think the ArgumentDo
syntax that I find awkward now is a matter of style, and one could probably get
used to only using it in certain places, despite all of the possibilities.
David/quchen
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell
more time it might work (fingers crossed).
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
#Remilestoningticketsafterarelease
The list of tickets for which you are the reporter or on the CC list is
given below. If any of these are causing problems for you, please let us
know on glasgow-haskell-b...@haskell.org and we'll look at raising the
priority.
Better still, if you are able to mak
)
Alloc rate2,668,201 bytes per MUT second
Productivity 99.6% of total user, 65.0% of total elapsed
real0m2.335s
user0m1.513s
sys 0m0.049s
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/m
ld' code look broken
to you (as detailed in my earlier reply to your message) ?
Cheers,
Chris
Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> The crash is in Haskell code, so the C backtrace is not to be trusted.
> Actually in this case it looks correct up to schedule(), and the
> uppermost frame is
M T Chakravarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> A full binary distribution of GHC 6.8.1 for Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) is
>>> available from
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~chak/haskell/ghc-6.8.1-i386-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
>> You do not
Brian P. O'Hanlon wrote:
> On Nov 6, 2007 1:29 AM, Manuel M T Chakravarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A full binary distribution of GHC 6.8.1 for Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) is
>> available from
>>
>>
>> http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~chak/haskell/ghc-6.8
ce it will look at the context for that instance.
--
Chris
_______
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
PROTECTED]
tel:917-770-6565 http://alexjacobson.com
_______
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
_
S. Alexander Jacobson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:917-770-6565 http://alexjacobson.com
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stefan Reich wrote:
>> I'd like to ask a general question about unsafePerformIO: What exactly
>> does unsafe mean? Just "impure" or rather "may lead to all kinds of
>> problems, you better don't us
s most of it's time 'read'ing. So the thing is just to
import GHC(read) instead of using the Prelude version? I guess it's
worth a try (although I expect I really need to go to binary IO)
-kzm
--
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
__
t seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
of giants
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Your mail to 'Glasgow-haskell-bugs' with the subject
Kontakt Lenste yeni yil firsati 1 Kutu Lens 35 Milyon USTELIK
ADRESE TESLIM KACIRMAYIN_6357474__
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to
En ucuz lensler icin lutfen tiklayin.
Bir telefonla adrese teslim.
http://www.akdenizgoz.com
Akdeniz Goz Merkezi
Fevzipaþa No:73 Fatih0 212 635 74 74
Listeden cikmak icin [EMAIL PROTECTED]adresine bos mail gonderiniz
[Forwarded from Haskell list]
I have got a rather special question about the implementation of
Glasgow Parallel Haskell (GPH). GPH uses the `par` operator to
specify expressions which can be evaluated in parallel by another
processing element. Closures representing such an expression are
66 matches
Mail list logo
