Hello Serge,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 07:55:05PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
...
Has the status of the module Random changed in ghc-7.4.1 ?
Between ghc-7.0.4 and ghc-7.4.1, we find
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.2.1/html/users_guide/release-7-2-1.html
that says:
1.5.12.22.
Hello Serge,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:03:45PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
...
This leads to
DExport.hs:28:8:
Could not find module `System.Random'
System.Random can be found in http://hackage.haskell.org/package/random.
Best regards
Thorkil
...
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 03:44:43PM +0200, Johan Tibell wrote:
...
I initially
tried to use the CPP ## string concatenation operator to create unique
names (tedious, but works) but GHC runs CPP in traditional mode so
that doesn't work.
One -traditional way that I have used to
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 01:03:04PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
...
Are there better workarounds?
I am not sure about that, I assume that you have looked at
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4068?
...
Best regards
Thorkil
___
Hello,
Yet another data point would be my current use of Haskell in various integer
factorization activities where I would consider the performance, even for
relatively large integers (say, 100-1000 decimal digits) very important.
However, I wouldn't complain if some simple and manageable
Hello,
On Thursday 19 March 2009 18:03, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:35:01PM +0100, Thorkil Naur wrote:
...
1. An important property of such installers is that you are told, right
from
the start, that all the information you are presented with during the
installation
Hello,
On Sunday 15 March 2009 16:51, Ian Lynagh wrote:
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 6.10.2:
...
Please test as much as possible; bugs are much cheaper if we find them
before the release!
...
I have tried the Intel Mac installer and the source package on
Hello Thomas,
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 15:03, Thomas Schilling wrote:
There should be a file called testlog somewhere, either at the
toplevel or within the tests directory. Could you search for
apirecomp001 and send me the test output from running that test. I
can't reproduce this
Hello,
On Monday 24 November 2008 23:15, Barney Stratford wrote:
There's good news and bad news. The good news is that the compilation of
my shiny almost-new GHC is complete. The bad news is, it won't link.
It's grumbling about
ld:
Hello,
On Monday 24 November 2008 23:48, Barney Stratford wrote:
The heading seems to be: Your build is missing it's required GMP (GNU
Multiple Precision) library
No, I have GMP installed, and it's correctly compiling against it. The
issue isn't that these symbols are missing altogether,
Hello Greg,
On Friday 21 November 2008 15:56, Gregory Wright wrote:
...
ppc/
Leopard still
fails, but I now have an account on a machine that I can use to test
and debug.
And if you need such an access (now or in the future), please just say the
word and you can get access to my PPC
Hello,
On Sunday 28 September 2008 19:27, humasect wrote:
Ah, indeed it does! Then, more about GHC API:
Shell: Shell: missing -Bdir option
I can't find any information of what this -B is, it is not in GHC sources or
anything helpful from google.
The -B is used from a ghc shell script to
Hello,
On Monday 08 September 2008 14:22, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Dear BDS hackers
We'd like GHC to be buildable on BSD, but at the moment it isn't. We
support GHC on Linux, Windows, Mac, but we really need help with BSD.
I would like to do something about this. I have (a number of) x86s
Hello,
On Thursday 17 January 2008 05:24, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
Thorkil Naur:
Hello,
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 15:07, Christian Maeder wrote:
Hi,
I've succeeded in building a binary distribution that uses static
libraries for gmp and readline. libreadline.a, libncurses.a
Hello,
On Thursday 17 January 2008 17:57, Christian Maeder wrote:
I understand that gmp is needed for the certain libraries like the
Prelude with Double and Integer.
But I do not understand why gmp is so deeply buried in the rts.
Are the basic types Int and Pointer not enough to write a
Hello,
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 22:05, Judah Jacobson wrote:
Hi all,
I have managed to build ghc using the initial release of the editline
package:
Hackage link:
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/editline-0.1
Haddock:
Hello,
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 15:07, Christian Maeder wrote:
Hi,
I've succeeded in building a binary distribution that uses static
libraries for gmp and readline. libreadline.a, libncurses.a and libgmp.a
with corresponding header files are included. (For license issues ask
someone
Hello,
On Friday 04 January 2008 12:03, Christian Maeder wrote:
...
Thanks a lot for this response.
I'm not happy about this framework hick-hack either.
I am glad we agree about that.
I've only pushed
it, because we needed a readline solution on macs.
I understand that there are
Hello,
First of all: Welcome to the club. I hope you will find it enjoyable. And then
to your questions:
I have never tried to bootstrap GHC from C, so I am not really able to help
with your specific problem. However, if you just want a running GHC, the
binary distributions should provide an
Hello,
On Thursday 20 December 2007 20:15, Jerry Charumilind wrote:
...
Besides getting a working compiler, my other goal is to get contribute
a working build process on Leopard back to MacPorts, since they
continue to have no solution right now
Hello,
The GHC User's Guide, Versio 6.6.1
(http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/options-optimise.html)
says:
-O currently also implies -fvia-C.
I seem to remember some communication a while back that seemed to imply that
this is no longer the case. So my question is: Is
Hello,
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 16:41, Ian Lynagh wrote:
We are pleased to announce the Release Candidate phase for GHC 6.6.1.
...
A few comments to the source bundles
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6.6.20070410-src.tar.bz2
Hello,
I'm afraid that this is outside my direct experience. However, looking at
http://lists.apple.com/archives/xcode-users/2006/Oct/msg00578.html
that google was kind enough to find for me, some assembler code generation
error seems indicated. I can see that you use -O2, but not whether
Hello,
A long shot, but perhaps worth looking into: The reaction that you report here
seems similar to the one reported in trac #1195 Build error on MacOSX (Intel)
10.4.8 for HEAD from 2007-03-05 when compiling with ghc-6.6:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1195
That ticket
Hello,
Sometimes, ghc complains about '#' for me when the C preprocessor has not been
run and there is an unexpected #include or #define in the way. Also, as I
read
ifeq $(ghc_ge_603) YES
# These modules are provided in GHC 6.3+
EXCLUDED_SRCS += \
System/Directory/Internals.hs
...
Hello,
Not much help, I'm afraid, but for what it's worth: I have built GHC-6.6 and
some HEAD-ish version successfully on a PowerBook G4 with Mac OS X 10.3
(Panther?) and also after upgrading to 10.4 Tiger. I have never tried with
10.2. To assist in your difficult decisions, here are some
:39 PM, Thorkil Naur wrote:
I am truly unable to tell what I would consider the ideal
situation. On the
one hand, I value greatly the freedom of choosing my circumstances
without
restraints. And I appreciate the desire of noble people like the GHC
developers to be equally free
Hello,
I am not an expert on sockets, but I have both a Linux installation and a PPC
Mac OS X 10.4 with both ghc-6.4.1 and ghc-6.6. So if you allow me some
additional details (such as complete program texts), perhaps I can perform
some useful experiments under your conductance.
Best regards
Hello,
It appears that you already got an answer to your question that I hope you can
use. So just for completeness: On my PPC Mac OS X 10.4, both ghc-6.4.1 and
ghc-6.6 produce results similar to the one you report for OSX. And on my Suse
Linux, both ghc-6.4.1 and ghc-6.6 produce results
Hello,
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 11:34, Simon Marlow wrote:
Thorkil Naur wrote:
... I have
produced an experimental darcs patch that solves some problems, while
possibly introducing others:
http://thorkilnaur.dk/~tn/GHC/testsuite/patch/barton_mangler_bug_patch_1.patch
Hello,
This is an attempt to address (a very small part of) this: On my PowerPC Mac
OS X 10.3 (Panther, I think, not Tiger as I have written elsewhere), I have
built the ghc-6.6 branch (of about 2006-Nov-07 19.00 UTC) using
GHC-6.4.1.pkg.zip (The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System,
Hello,
Let me make that offer, then, that I would like to help investigate and fix
GHC on MacOS. The obstacles that I have mentioned earlier are ones that I
would eventually have removed in any case, so don't worry, I will not be
wasting any time.
Regards Thorkil
On Monday 02 October 2006
Hello,
Nobody seems to have reacted on this. I own a Mac that I don't use
particularly much. It seems within reach that I could use it to assist you
with both of your questions. As a side effect of having great fun myself, of
course.
There are several obstacles that need to be removed,
Hello Peter,
Sorry for the late reply. From your latest communication which seems to be
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 21:12:05 -0400
From: Peter Tanski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OpenSSL License (was Replacement for GMP: Update)
To: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am a bit uncertain where the
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 01:35, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
primitives work with just the same internal structures. i thinl that
only real advantage of adding primop instead of adding FFI import is
that PrimOps.cmm contains already implemented wrappers for calling GMP
functions while for FFI you
On Monday 27 March 2006 12:57, Simon Marlow wrote:
quotInteger2Expzh_fast is the function you are adding to PrimOps.cmm to
implement the primop. The patch in your original message indicated that
you had added a stub for this function, so it should link ok. I don't
understand what has gone
On Monday 27 March 2006 16:33, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Thorkil, i can't understand why you can't just use FFI to import
functions you required? why you need to patch the PrimOps list?
Hello,
As I wrote earlier, using FFI is also a candidate for getting access to
additional GMP functions.
to make GHC.Prim.hi
but I have not been able to find anything that relates to this.
So I am again at a loss, aksing for help to proceed.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Best regards
Thorkil Naur
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users
/Haskell/work ghc --version
The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 6.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tn/tmp/Haskell/work
Best regards
Thorkil Naur
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http
39 matches
Mail list logo
