Hello,
This is on the recent topic of very eager inlining in ghc-6.8.3.
I wrote recently that
(1) 6.8.3 takes 7 times more of heap than 6.8.2 to complile under -O
a certain small-size module RsePol_ (let us call it M.hs),
(2) even the needed ~70 Mb in 6.8.2 looks unnaturally large.
Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
What is the difference between ghc-6.8.2 and ghc-6.8.3 ?
Compile times were improved by 4.3% over the nofib suite between 6.8.2 and
6.8.3. Code size was unaffected (down 0.2%). Runtime and allocation were
also about the same.
That's not to say that we don't
