RE: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.2.1 - {-# LANGUAGE NoTraditionalRecordSyntax #-}

2012-03-27 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
- | From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell- | users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of AntC | Sent: 26 March 2012 23:47 | To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.2.1 - {-# LANGUAGE | NoTraditionalRecordSyntax #-} | | | Ian Lynagh igloo

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.2.1 - {-# LANGUAGE NoTraditionalRecordSyntax #-}

2012-03-27 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:47:14PM +, AntC wrote: Ticket #3356 claims that {-# LANGUAGE NoTraditionalRecordSyntax #-} was implemented in 7.2.1. But GHCi v7.2.1 complains Unsupported extension: NoTraditionalRecordSyntax. What (if anything) actually got implemented? It was implemented

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.2.1 - {-#LANGUAGE NoTraditionalRecordSyntax#-}

2012-03-27 Thread AntC
Ian Lynagh igloo at earth.li writes: On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:47:14PM +, AntC wrote: Ticket #3356 claims that {-# LANGUAGE NoTraditionalRecordSyntax #-} was implemented in 7.2.1. But GHCi v7.2.1 complains Unsupported extension: NoTraditionalRecordSyntax. What (if

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.2.1 - {-#LANGUAGE NoTraditionalRecordSyntax#-}

2012-03-27 Thread AntC
Simon Peyton-Jones simonpj at microsoft.com writes: ghci -XNoTraditionalRecordSyntax does not complain of unsupported extensions for me. OK, it's effective in v7.4.1, as Ian says. The flag appears to just disable record construction and update syntax, and record patterns, and record

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.2.1 - {-# LANGUAGE NoTraditionalRecordSyntax #-}

2012-03-26 Thread AntC
Ian Lynagh igloo at earth.li writes: = The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 7.2.1 = Ticket #3356 claims that {-# LANGUAGE