On 06/12/12 22:11, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
So are you going to add the two missing MachOps, MO_UF_Conv MO_FU_Conv?
I'm trying to add those. I'm now thinking that I will use C calls
(which is still much faster than going via
On 06/12/12 00:29, Johan Tibell wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to implement word2Double# and I've looked at how e.g. LLVM
does it. LLVM outputs quite clever branchless code that uses two
predefined constants in the .data section. Is it possible to add
contents to the current .data section from a
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
So are you going to add the two missing MachOps, MO_UF_Conv MO_FU_Conv?
I'm trying to add those. I'm now thinking that I will use C calls
(which is still much faster than going via Integer) instead of
emitting some assembly,
Hi!
I'm trying to implement word2Double# and I've looked at how e.g. LLVM
does it. LLVM outputs quite clever branchless code that uses two
predefined constants in the .data section. Is it possible to add
contents to the current .data section from a function in the NatM
monad e.g.
