On 12-02-29 09:30 PM, Brent Yorgey wrote:
I wonder about the possibility of making a simple tool to parse the
output of cabal install -v3 and visualize/organize it in some sort of
way to make this process easier. What might such
visualization/organization look like?
The most useful information
Ok, I got Hoogle to work with GHC 7.0.3. I abandoned my try to update to
the newest version of GHC, due to some other things which don't work.
For example I can't import Data.Map any more.
As long as these errors occur I see no reason to switch to a newer version.
With Hoogle 4.2.9 I could suc
You are right. When I try to install parsec by myself I get the same
error message.
But neither "ghc-pkg list" nor "ghc-pkg check" prints any error
messages. The latter only prints some warnings because of missing
haddock files.
Complete output of the error message:
$cabal install parsec -v
Hi Antoras,
My suspicion is you've ended up with corrupted packages in your
package database - nothing to do with Hoogle. I suspect trying to
install parsec-3.1.2 directly would give the same error message. Can
you try ghc-pkg list, and at the bottom it will probably say something
like:
The follo
Hi Antoras,
I've just released Hoogle 4.2.9, which allows Cabal 1.15, so hopefully
will install correctly for you.
Thanks, Neil
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Neil Mitchell wrote:
> Hi Antoras,
>
> The darcs version of Hoogle has had a more permissive dependency for a few
> weeks. Had I realis
Hi Antoras,
The darcs version of Hoogle has had a more permissive dependency for a few
weeks. Had I realised the dependency caused problems I'd have released a
new version immediately! As it stands, I'll release a new version in about
4 hours. If you can't wait that long, try darcs get
http://code
Ok, interesting info. But how to solve the problem now? Should I contact
the author of Hoogle and ask him about how solving this?
On 03/01/2012 02:02 AM, Albert Y. C. Lai wrote:
On 12-02-29 06:04 AM, Antoras wrote:
I don't know where the dependency to array-0.3.0.3 comes from. Is it
possible
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 08:02:11PM -0500, Albert Y. C. Lai wrote:
>
> It is possible to fish the output of "cabal install --dry-run -v3
> hoogle" for why array-0.3.0.3 is brought in. It really is fishing,
> since the output is copious and of low information density. Chinese
> idiom: needle in ocea
On 12-02-29 06:04 AM, Antoras wrote:
I don't know where the dependency to array-0.3.0.3 comes from. Is it
possible to get more info from cabal than -v?
hoogle-4.2.8 has "Cabal >= 1.8 && < 1.13", this brings in Cabal-1.12.0.
Cabal-1.12.0 has "array >= 0.1 && < 0.4", this brings in array-0.3.0.3
I don't know where the dependency to array-0.3.0.3 comes from. Is it
possible to get more info from cabal than -v?
On Wed 29 Feb 2012 11:09:14 AM CET, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
On 29 Feb 2012, at 09:53, Antoras wrote:
I updated my GHC version from 7.0.3 to 7.4.1. But after that GHC is unable t
On 29 Feb 2012, at 09:53, Antoras wrote:
> I updated my GHC version from 7.0.3 to 7.4.1. But after that GHC is unable to
> install some required packages.
>
>
> containers-0.4.2.1 (reinstall) changes: array-0.4.0.0 -> 0.3.0.3
> binary-0.5.1.0 (reinstall) changes: array-0.4.0.0 -> 0.3.0.3
I be
I updated my GHC version from 7.0.3 to 7.4.1. But after that GHC is
unable to install some required packages. For example when I type in
'cabal install -v hoogle' I get a lot of errors (see end of message).
Even after reinstalling the newest packages the errors still occurs. I
use Linux-x86_64 a
12 matches
Mail list logo