Hi!
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Sittampalam, Ganesh
ganesh.sittampa...@credit-suisse.com wrote:
If GHC added support or patterns, you could write them out quite
concisely:
bar Foo1 Foo2 Foo3 = ...
bar (Foo1|Foo2|Foo3) (Foo1|Foo2|Foo3) (Foo1|Foo2|Foo3) = error ...
Uh. Still no nice
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Christian Maeder
christian.mae...@dfki.de wrote:
I tend to introduce artificial error cases for the Impossible, to
avoid warnings, although the compiler generated error messages are
better to locate the problem.
But this is often problematic. I was also
Mitar wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Christian Maeder
christian.mae...@dfki.de wrote:
I tend to introduce artificial error cases for the Impossible, to
avoid warnings, although the compiler generated error messages are
better to locate the problem.
But this is often
.
S
| -Original Message-
| From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-
| users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Mitar
| Sent: 21 September 2010 07:44
| To: glasgow-haskell-users
| Subject: Non-exhaustive pattern match(es) warning in lambda functions
...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Mitar
| Sent: 21 September 2010 07:44
| To: glasgow-haskell-users
| Subject: Non-exhaustive pattern match(es) warning in lambda functions
|
| Hi!
|
| Why GHC does not warn (with -Wall) about non-exhaustive pattern
| match(es) warning in lambda functions? For example
pattern match(es) warning in lambda functions
|
| Hi!
|
| Why GHC does not warn (with -Wall) about non-exhaustive pattern
| match(es) warning in lambda functions? For example, this code:
|
| data Foo = Bar | Baz
|
| test1 :: Foo - IO ()
| test1 Bar = return () -- Pattern match(es
-haskell-
| | users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Mitar
| | Sent: 21 September 2010 07:44
| | To: glasgow-haskell-users
| | Subject: Non-exhaustive pattern match(es) warning in lambda functions
| |
| | Hi!
| |
| | Why GHC does not warn (with -Wall) about non-exhaustive pattern
| | match
] On Behalf Of Mitar
| | Sent: 21 September 2010 07:44
| | To: glasgow-haskell-users
| | Subject: Non-exhaustive pattern match(es) warning in lambda functions
| |
| | Hi!
| |
| | Why GHC does not warn (with -Wall) about non-exhaustive pattern
| | match(es) warning in lambda functions
| Subject: Non-exhaustive pattern match(es) warning in lambda functions
|
| Hi!
|
| Why GHC does not warn (with -Wall) about non-exhaustive pattern
| match(es) warning in lambda functions? For example, this code:
|
| data Foo = Bar | Baz
|
| test1 :: Foo - IO ()
| test1 Bar = return () -- Pattern match
Hi!
Why GHC does not warn (with -Wall) about non-exhaustive pattern
match(es) warning in lambda functions? For example, this code:
data Foo = Bar | Baz
test1 :: Foo - IO ()
test1 Bar = return () -- Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive warning, OK
test2 :: Foo - IO ()
test2 = \Bar - return
10 matches
Mail list logo
