Re: OSX i386/x86 and x86_64 - time to switch supported platforms?

2011-02-04 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 07:38:41PM +0800, Max Cantor wrote: The last 32-bit, Intel Mac was the Mac Mini, discontinued in August 2007. The bulk of them were discontinued in 2006, along with PowerPC Macs. Does it make sense to relegate OSX x86_64 to community status while the 32-bit version

OSX i386/x86 and x86_64 - time to switch supported platforms?

2011-02-01 Thread Max Cantor
The last 32-bit, Intel Mac was the Mac Mini, discontinued in August 2007. The bulk of them were discontinued in 2006, along with PowerPC Macs. Does it make sense to relegate OSX x86_64 to community status while the 32-bit version is considered a supported platform? Given that I'm far from

Re: OSX i386/x86 and x86_64 - time to switch supported platforms?

2011-02-01 Thread John Meacham
Even though the hardware is x86_64, I thought the vast majority of macs used a 32 bit build of OSX and 32 bit programs? John On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Max Cantor mxcan...@gmail.com wrote: The last 32-bit, Intel Mac was the Mac Mini, discontinued in August 2007. The bulk of them

Re: OSX i386/x86 and x86_64 - time to switch supported platforms?

2011-02-01 Thread Pavel Perikov
On 01.02.2011, at 15:10, John Meacham wrote: Even though the hardware is x86_64, I thought the vast majority of macs used a 32 bit build of OSX and 32 bit programs? Mac OS X started supporting 64-bit console application since Tiger. Since Leopard it supports 64-bit gui apps. Currently we

Re: OSX i386/x86 and x86_64 - time to switch supported platforms?

2011-02-01 Thread Tim Whelan
Max Cantor mxcan...@gmail.com writes: Thanks Debbie, I've confirmed with the other chaps (for the second chalet). Is there any news on a boat for us? Regards Tim The last 32-bit, Intel Mac was the Mac Mini, discontinued in August 2007. The bulk of them were discontinued in 2006, along with

Re: OSX i386/x86 and x86_64 - time to switch supported platforms?

2011-02-01 Thread malcolm.wallace
MacOS 10.5 is still largely 32-bit. MacOS 10.6 is largely 64-bit. Both are capable of compiling and running for the alternative word-size choice, fairly transparently. 10.6 was released August 2009, but there are likely plenty of people still running 10.5.Regards, MalcolmOn 01 Feb, 2011,at

Re: OSX i386/x86 and x86_64 - time to switch supported platforms?

2011-02-01 Thread Pavel Perikov
To make it clear. Leopard (released October 2007) fully supports x86_64 executables. Given upgrade rate of Mac community I think it's pretty safe to state that majority of mac owners have x86-64 capable systems. pavel On 01.02.2011, at 15:30, malcolm.wallace wrote: MacOS 10.5 is still

Re: OSX i386/x86 and x86_64 - time to switch supported platforms?

2011-02-01 Thread Max Cantor
On OSX, as of 10.5, both the 32-bit kernel and the 64-bit kernel can seamlessly run x86_64 binaries in 64-bit mode. MacPorts now defaults to 64-bit for instance. mc On Feb 1, 2011, at 8:10 PM, John Meacham wrote: Even though the hardware is x86_64, I thought the vast majority of macs used