On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 04:17:11PM +0100, Neil Brown wrote:
>
> $ ghc -O1 -prof -auto-all --make CommsTime.hs
> [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( CommsTime.hs, CommsTime.o )
> Linking CommsTime ...
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lHSffi_p
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Thanks for the report
On 22/10/2009 13:05, Christian Maeder wrote:
Simon Marlow schrieb:
On 22/10/2009 11:09, Christian Maeder wrote:
Simon Marlow schrieb:
Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think?
+1
I've quite some trouble to port our old code to ghc-6.12
and did not test RC1 much.
http://trac
Simon Marlow:
Or, we could just make a 6.12.1 RC2, and advertise it with the same
caveats, putting out 6.12.1 when cabal-install works and we've had a
chance to see the state of Hackage and alert package authors.
Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think?
I agree. I don't t
Simon Marlow schrieb:
> On 22/10/2009 11:09, Christian Maeder wrote:
>> Simon Marlow schrieb:
>>> Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think?
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I've quite some trouble to port our old code to ghc-6.12
>> and did not test RC1 much.
>>
>> http://trac.informatik.uni-bremen.d
On 22/10/2009 11:09, Christian Maeder wrote:
Simon Marlow schrieb:
Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think?
+1
I've quite some trouble to port our old code to ghc-6.12
and did not test RC1 much.
http://trac.informatik.uni-bremen.de:8080/hets/ticket/749
http://www.informatik.
At Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:15:26 +0100,
Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> The current dilemma we're facing with the 6.12.1 release is this:
> cabal-install still needs to be ported to the new version of Cabal,
> Duncan is snowed under and doesn't have time to work on it, but without
> cabal-install people ca
Simon Marlow schrieb:
> Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think?
+1
I've quite some trouble to port our old code to ghc-6.12
and did not test RC1 much.
http://trac.informatik.uni-bremen.de:8080/hets/ticket/749
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/htk/
Cheers Christian
_
Simon Marlow writes:
> Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think?
This sounds about right. There's no reason to not be conservative here.
--
\ Troels
/\ Henriksen
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.o
> Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think?
+1
Definitely preferable to the chaos that would otherwise ensue.
/Niklas
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasg
Simon Marlow wrote:
> The current dilemma we're facing with the 6.12.1 release is this:
> cabal-install still needs to be ported to the new version of Cabal,
> Duncan is snowed under and doesn't have time to work on it, but
> without cabal-install people can't easily test 6.12.1 RC and we can't
> t
10 matches
Mail list logo