Re: 6.12.1 Release Candidate: profiling and libHSffi_p.a

2009-11-07 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 04:17:11PM +0100, Neil Brown wrote: > > $ ghc -O1 -prof -auto-all --make CommsTime.hs > [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( CommsTime.hs, CommsTime.o ) > Linking CommsTime ... > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lHSffi_p > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Thanks for the report

Re: GHC.IO was: Re: 6.12.1 release

2009-11-02 Thread Simon Marlow
On 22/10/2009 13:05, Christian Maeder wrote: Simon Marlow schrieb: On 22/10/2009 11:09, Christian Maeder wrote: Simon Marlow schrieb: Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think? +1 I've quite some trouble to port our old code to ghc-6.12 and did not test RC1 much. http://trac

Re: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Manuel M T Chakravarty
Simon Marlow: Or, we could just make a 6.12.1 RC2, and advertise it with the same caveats, putting out 6.12.1 when cabal-install works and we've had a chance to see the state of Hackage and alert package authors. Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think? I agree. I don't t

GHC.IO was: Re: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Christian Maeder
Simon Marlow schrieb: > On 22/10/2009 11:09, Christian Maeder wrote: >> Simon Marlow schrieb: >>> Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think? >> >> +1 >> >> I've quite some trouble to port our old code to ghc-6.12 >> and did not test RC1 much. >> >> http://trac.informatik.uni-bremen.d

Re: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Simon Marlow
On 22/10/2009 11:09, Christian Maeder wrote: Simon Marlow schrieb: Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think? +1 I've quite some trouble to port our old code to ghc-6.12 and did not test RC1 much. http://trac.informatik.uni-bremen.de:8080/hets/ticket/749 http://www.informatik.

Re: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Robin Green
At Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:15:26 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > > The current dilemma we're facing with the 6.12.1 release is this: > cabal-install still needs to be ported to the new version of Cabal, > Duncan is snowed under and doesn't have time to work on it, but without > cabal-install people ca

Re: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Christian Maeder
Simon Marlow schrieb: > Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think? +1 I've quite some trouble to port our old code to ghc-6.12 and did not test RC1 much. http://trac.informatik.uni-bremen.de:8080/hets/ticket/749 http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/htk/ Cheers Christian _

Re: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Troels Henriksen
Simon Marlow writes: > Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think? This sounds about right. There's no reason to not be conservative here. -- \ Troels /\ Henriksen ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.o

Re: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Niklas Broberg
> Simon and I favour the RC2 option.  What do others think? +1 Definitely preferable to the chaos that would otherwise ensue. /Niklas ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasg

RE: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Sittampalam, Ganesh
Simon Marlow wrote: > The current dilemma we're facing with the 6.12.1 release is this: > cabal-install still needs to be ported to the new version of Cabal, > Duncan is snowed under and doesn't have time to work on it, but > without cabal-install people can't easily test 6.12.1 RC and we can't > t