Donn Cave wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:23:36 -0700
Donn Cave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... It looks like, in base anyway, this actually goes in a .h file,
to a pattern like
... ah, never mind that, I see those wrappers are not the sort I need.
Yes, those are the kind of wrappers I mean.
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:14:02 +0100
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donn Cave wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:23:36 -0700
Donn Cave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... It looks like, in base anyway, this actually goes in a .h file,
to a pattern like
... ah, never mind that, I see
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:23:36 -0700
Donn Cave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... It looks like, in base anyway, this actually goes in a .h file,
to a pattern like
... ah, never mind that, I see those wrappers are not the sort I need.
--
Donn Cave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:36:41 +0100
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donn Cave wrote:
...
20080531 and NetBSD-amd64 4.0, not so good:
GHCi, version 6.8.2.20080531: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Loading package base ... linking ... done.
Bad system call (core
Donn Cave wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008 10:43:22 -0400
Gregory Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/attachment/ticket/2013/2013.patch
*BSD folks please test.
I built the 20080529 snapshot with this patch and my light testing of
ghci
showed no problems (FreeBSD
Gregory Wright wrote:
Hi,
On May 29, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
Ok, I've now modified the patch and attached a new version to the
ticket:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/attachment/ticket/2013/2013.patch
*BSD folks please test.
I built the 20080529 snapshot with this
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:36:41 +0100
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, it won't build with the GNU ar that's standard on this
platform. It can't index archives as big as libHSbase.a: apparently, it
allocates too many moderately large hash tables for the many small modules
On Fri, 30 May 2008 10:43:22 -0400
Gregory Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/attachment/ticket/2013/2013.patch
*BSD folks please test.
I built the 20080529 snapshot with this patch and my light testing of
ghci
showed no problems (FreeBSD
Hi,
On May 29, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
Ok, I've now modified the patch and attached a new version to the
ticket:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/attachment/ticket/2013/2013.patch
*BSD folks please test.
I built the 20080529 snapshot with this patch and my light
Hi Simon,
On May 29, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
Ok, I've now modified the patch and attached a new version to the
ticket:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/attachment/ticket/2013/2013.patch
*BSD folks please test.
I built the 20080529 snapshot with this patch and my light
Don Stewart wrote:
marlowsd:
Hi Folks,
6.8.3 is nearing release, and we have an outstanding bug affecting the
GHCi on the BSDs:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2013
We need someone to help out with this. The patch in the ticket apparently
works, but can't be committed as is
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
So, try the patch to get the patch to compile against ghc
6.8.3-snapshot, and see if it works on OpenBSD?
It's not just a case of testing the patch, there are a couple of issues to
address:
- it has a couple of wired-in addresses: one place to
On Thu, 29 May 2008 11:56:59 + (UTC)
Wilhelm B. Kloke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
- it has a couple of wired-in addresses: one place to load object files,
another to put jump tables at. This is necessary because *BSD doesn't
have the
Ok, I've now modified the patch and attached a new version to the ticket:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/attachment/ticket/2013/2013.patch
*BSD folks please test.
Wilhelm B. Kloke wrote:
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
So, try the patch to get the patch to compile against ghc
Hi Simon,
On May 28, 2008, at 5:05 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
Hi Folks,
6.8.3 is nearing release, and we have an outstanding bug affecting
the GHCi on the BSDs:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2013
We need someone to help out with this. The patch in the ticket
apparently
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:25:48PM -0400, Gregory Wright wrote:
I have a FreeBSD 7.0/x86_64 machine I can test this on. Should the
patch be applied to the
6.8.3 release candidate tarball, or just the head of the 6.8.x branch?
Either, they're the same at the moment - although if you want
marlowsd:
Hi Folks,
6.8.3 is nearing release, and we have an outstanding bug affecting the
GHCi on the BSDs:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2013
We need someone to help out with this. The patch in the ticket apparently
works, but can't be committed as is because it
17 matches
Mail list logo