On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 10:53:36AM -, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> Thanks for the typo. Yes, for Haskell guys 'guard' is fine; but the
> main audience for the paper is non-haskell folk, so we have to spell out
> the defn.
>
> S
Hm, what about calling it `guard' and adding a footnote saying
th
Thanks for the typo. Yes, for Haskell guys 'guard' is fine; but the
main audience for the paper is non-haskell folk, so we have to spell out
the defn.
S
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Remi Turk
| Sent: 06 Feb
