Re: ghci and ld scripts

2004-05-23 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 17:22, Sven Panne wrote: > Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > > We've no idea what to do here. In your case it'd be possible to just > > ignore the script, but presumably not so in general. [...] > > I've just made a quick test on my SuSE 9.1 Linux and it seems to be the > case tha

Re: ghci and ld scripts

2004-05-21 Thread Sven Panne
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: We've no idea what to do here. In your case it'd be possible to just ignore the script, but presumably not so in general. [...] I've just made a quick test on my SuSE 9.1 Linux and it seems to be the case that an explicit "-lpthread" is not necessary anymore, even for pro

RE: ghci and ld scripts

2004-05-21 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
We've no idea what to do here. In your case it'd be possible to just ignore the script, but presumably not so in general. If anyone who understands the problem properly would like to advise, we'd be happy to hear from them. Parsing ld scripts seems beyond what our linker is ever going to do! Sim