On 09 March 2005 10:14, Ralf Hinze wrote:
> this is just to let you know that I successfully compiled the lastest
> snapshot (ghc-6.4.20050308). Initial tests look promising. Thanks!
>
> Cheers, Ralf
>
> PS: Just curious: is the gcc route easier than the NCG? To me it seems
> much more fragile.
Hi Simon,
this is just to let you know that I successfully compiled the lastest
snapshot (ghc-6.4.20050308). Initial tests look promising. Thanks!
Cheers, Ralf
PS: Just curious: is the gcc route easier than the NCG? To me it seems
much more fragile.
__
Simon Marlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Simon!
> I've put up an x86_64/Linux registerised build for testing here:
Thank you very much.
> This is a binary distribution: ./configure && make -k install. The -k
> is necessary because it doesn't have all the docs. It was built on
> Fedora FC3.
On 08 March 2005 15:59, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:16 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
>> I've put up an x86_64/Linux registerised build for testing here:
>>
>>
>>
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6.4-x86_64-unknown-linux
>> .tar.bz2
>>
>> This is a binary distrib
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:16 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> I've put up an x86_64/Linux registerised build for testing here:
>
>
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6.4-x86_64-unknown-linux
> .tar.bz2
>
> This is a binary distribution: ./configure && make -k install. The -k
> is nec
I've put up an x86_64/Linux registerised build for testing here:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6.4-x86_64-unknown-linux
.tar.bz2
This is a binary distribution: ./configure && make -k install. The -k
is necessary because it doesn't have all the docs. It was built on
Fedora F
