On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 05:30:44AM +0200, Thanos Tsouanas wrote:
> Up to now I've only used binary versions of GHC, but since
> my operating system's (OpenBSD) version of GHC is
> lagging behind (currently at 6.6.1), I need to update it.
> I tried using my system's ghc-6.6.1 to compile ghc-6.10.4
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 03:29:09PM +0200, Thanos Tsouanas wrote:
>> > No need for 6.8, you can build 6.10 straight with 6.6.
>>
>> Ok, I guess I didn't try hard enough..
>
> Probably just
> --with-iconv-includes=/usr/local/include \
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 03:29:09PM +0200, Thanos Tsouanas wrote:
> > No need for 6.8, you can build 6.10 straight with 6.6.
>
> Ok, I guess I didn't try hard enough..
Probably just
--with-iconv-includes=/usr/local/include \
--with-iconv-libraries=/usr/local/lib
missing to ./conf
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Matthias Kilian
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 09:22:56AM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
>> I somehow managed to first install everything what's required on system
>> provided 6.6.1 to compile 6.10. I'm not sure if I went step by step
>> 6.6.1->6.8.3->6.10.3 as you
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Karel Gardas wrote:
> Thanos Tsouanas wrote:
>> Hello list.
>>
>> Up to now I've only used binary versions of GHC, but since
>> my operating system's (OpenBSD) version of GHC is
>> lagging behind (currently at 6.6.1), I need to update it.
>> I tried using my syste
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 09:22:56AM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
> I somehow managed to first install everything what's required on system
> provided 6.6.1 to compile 6.10. I'm not sure if I went step by step
> 6.6.1->6.8.3->6.10.3 as you try.
No need for 6.8, you can build 6.10 straight with 6.6.
>
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 05:30:44AM +0200, Thanos Tsouanas wrote:
> Up to now I've only used binary versions of GHC, but since
> my operating system's (OpenBSD) version of GHC is
> lagging behind (currently at 6.6.1), I need to update it.
> I tried using my system's ghc-6.6.1 to compile ghc-6.10.4
>
Thanos Tsouanas wrote:
> Hello list.
>
> Up to now I've only used binary versions of GHC, but since
> my operating system's (OpenBSD) version of GHC is
> lagging behind (currently at 6.6.1), I need to update it.
> I tried using my system's ghc-6.6.1 to compile ghc-6.10.4
> but it failed due to has
Hello list.
Up to now I've only used binary versions of GHC, but since
my operating system's (OpenBSD) version of GHC is
lagging behind (currently at 6.6.1), I need to update it.
I tried using my system's ghc-6.6.1 to compile ghc-6.10.4
but it failed due to haskeline not being installed (and tryin