On 17 June 2004 13:09, Bennett Todd wrote:
2004-06-17T09:04:40 Simon Marlow:
Hmmm. Try these please:
make show VALUE=ProjectsToBuild
make show VALUE=ProjectsThatExist
make show VALUE=SUBDIRS
bash-2.05b$ make show VALUE=ProjectsToBuild
ProjectsToBuild=
bash-2.05b$ make show
On 17 June 2004 17:30, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thursday 17 June 2004 17:38, Simon Marlow wrote:
It looks like registerised compilation on x86_64 isn't quite working
yet, then. If you're up to debugging this, then I suggest you start
from a simpler program - try hello world registerised, and
2004-06-18T01:57:14 Donald Bruce Stewart:
That's interesting. GHC unregisterised on amd64/openbsd *does* pass all
the testsuite tests.
Which brings us around to the question that opened this thread, is
there any way to install the unregistered build?
Thanks,
-Bennett
pgpxPpD8HzWZd.pgp
bet:
2004-06-18T01:57:14 Donald Bruce Stewart:
That's interesting. GHC unregisterised on amd64/openbsd *does* pass all
the testsuite tests.
Which brings us around to the question that opened this thread, is
there any way to install the unregistered build?
Yes. Download and build the src,
On Friday 18 June 2004 15:39, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
bet:
Which brings us around to the question that opened this thread, is
there any way to install the unregistered build?
Yes. Download and build the src, and 'make install' :-)
For some platforms unregistered builds are even being
listener:
On Friday 18 June 2004 15:39, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
bet:
Which brings us around to the question that opened this thread, is
there any way to install the unregistered build?
Yes. Download and build the src, and 'make install' :-)
For some platforms unregistered
On 17 June 2004 10:59, Gerd M wrote:
I managed to create an unregistered build that compiles the hello
world example.
# file hello
hello: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for
GNU/Linux 2.6.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped
Great!
2004-06-17T09:04:40 Simon Marlow:
Hmmm. Try these please:
make show VALUE=ProjectsToBuild
make show VALUE=ProjectsThatExist
make show VALUE=SUBDIRS
bash-2.05b$ make show VALUE=ProjectsToBuild
ProjectsToBuild=
bash-2.05b$ make show VALUE=ProjectsThatExist
ProjectsThatExist=
Simon Marlow wrote:
This one looks like a failure from GCC, not GHC. If possible, you
should send a bug report to the GCC folks or Gentoo as requested.
You could try using a different version of GCC to work around the
problem.
Unfortunately I've only got one gcc version installed at the moment
On Thursday 17 June 2004 15:01, Gerd M wrote:
Unfortunately I've only got one gcc version installed at the moment and I'm
not sure if installing another version won't break something... Maybe I
will give it another try later this week, thanks for your help so far!
Regards
Gerd
Since I'm
On 17 June 2004 14:08, Peter Robinson wrote:
==fptools== make all -wr;
in /home/thaldyron/var/ghcbuild/ghc-6.2.20040613/libraries/base
rm -f
Well the build finally succeeded but unfortunately I immediately get a
segfault when running ghc/ghci.
I've attached the output of
# strace -o log ./ghc
Cheers
Peter
On Thursday 17 June 2004 15:25, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 17 June 2004 14:08, Peter Robinson wrote:
On 17 June 2004 16:29, Peter Robinson wrote:
Well the build finally succeeded but unfortunately I immediately get a
segfault when running ghc/ghci.
I've attached the output of
# strace -o log ./ghc
It looks like registerised compilation on x86_64 isn't quite working
yet, then. If you're up
listener:
On Thursday 17 June 2004 17:38, Simon Marlow wrote:
It looks like registerised compilation on x86_64 isn't quite working
yet, then. If you're up to debugging this, then I suggest you start
from a simpler program - try hello world registerised, and then slightly
larger programs
Simon Marlow wrote:
After hc-build, you should unpack a completely fresh GHC source tree,
somewhere else. Then 'cd' into this tree, and issue the configure/make
commands.
I tried this and got as far as:
==fptools== make all
On 16 June 2004 11:00, Gerd M wrote:
Simon Marlow wrote:
After hc-build, you should unpack a completely fresh GHC source tree,
somewhere else. Then 'cd' into this tree, and issue the
configure/make commands.
I tried this and got as far as:
Simon Marlow wrote:
It looks like HC bootstrapping is enabled in this tree; it shouldn't be.
Just use a completely fresh source tree, don't configure with
--enable-hc-boot, and don't unpack any HC files into it.
If I use a fresh source tree without HCs then I need the unregistered build
to
2004-06-16T10:33:49 Simon Marlow:
On 15 June 2004 16:24, Bennett Todd wrote:
2004-06-15T14:52:53 Simon Marlow:
After hc-build, you should unpack a completely fresh GHC source tree,
somewhere else. Then 'cd' into this tree, and issue the
configure/make commands.
Alas, no joy; again,
On 16 June 2004 13:19, Gerd M wrote:
Simon Marlow wrote:
It looks like HC bootstrapping is enabled in this tree; it shouldn't
be. Just use a completely fresh source tree, don't configure with
--enable-hc-boot, and don't unpack any HC files into it.
If I use a fresh source tree without HCs
2004-06-16T13:26:45 Simon Marlow:
Bennett, who said he had a working unregisterised build.
I'm by no means a Haskell expert, or even a Haskell programmer; but
my unregistered build does do hello.hs successfully.
-Bennett
pgp9V3uOTefQY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 14 June 2004 21:57, Gerd M wrote:
Well I just tried it and that's what happened:
==fptools== make boot - --no-print-directory -r;
in ghc-6.2.1/ghc/utils/ghc-pkg
2004-06-14T16:06:05 Simon Marlow:
You probably don't want to install the registerised build; just use it
to build a fresh tree:
$ ./configure
--with-ghc=/unregisterised-build/ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace
$ make
Everything was fine up to there, but make does nothing at all.
I followed the
On 15 June 2004 14:18, Bennett Todd wrote:
2004-06-14T16:06:05 Simon Marlow:
You probably don't want to install the registerised build; just use
it to build a fresh tree:
$ ./configure
--with-ghc=/unregisterised-build/ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace
$ make
Everything was fine up to
2004-06-15T14:52:53 Simon Marlow:
On 15 June 2004 14:18, Bennett Todd wrote:
./distrib/hc-build ...
./configure --with-ghc=`pwd`/ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace
make
That last make didn't do anything.
After hc-build, you should unpack a completely fresh GHC source tree,
somewhere else.
2004-06-15T14:52:53 Simon Marlow:
After hc-build, you should unpack a completely fresh GHC source tree,
somewhere else. Then 'cd' into this tree, and issue the configure/make
commands.
Alas, no joy; again, make does nothing.
These Makefiles are cleverer than I am, I can't quite figure out
On 02 June 2004 18:40, Bennett Todd wrote:
I too would be happy with an unregistered build.
I've tried off and on to port ghc to my linux distro (uses static
linking against uClibc, glibc isn't present at all). Every time I go
through the process, I get stuck at the point where I seem to
2004-06-14T16:06:05 Simon Marlow:
You probably don't want to install the registerised build; just use it
to build a fresh tree:
$ ./configure
--with-ghc=/unregisterised-build/ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace
$ make
Thanks, I'll give it another go. It'll be a few days before I can
get back with
Well I just tried it and that's what happened:
==fptools== make boot - --no-print-directory -r;
in ghc-6.2.1/ghc/utils/ghc-pkg
ghc-test/usr/bin/ghc -M
This was causing the error:
version = tail \
\ GHC_PKG_VERSION
However, when i moved it all in one line it worked and i got as far as this
but i think that's the end of the line for now:
==fptools== make boot -wr;
in
I too would be happy with an unregistered build.
I've tried off and on to port ghc to my linux distro (uses static
linking against uClibc, glibc isn't present at all). Every time I go
through the process, I get stuck at the point where I seem to have a
working unregistered build. I can't quite
30 matches
Mail list logo
