Anyone with a multi-core processor would be.
Most of the people, I assume.
How would you implement this, though?
On Apr 5, 2007, at 10:01 AM, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
it's true that production GHC version doesn't support multi-threaded
compilation, so such system will be of benefit even for
Hello Joel,
Thursday, April 5, 2007, 1:33:27 PM, you wrote:
my sentence should be read as is it true...? - i had lost a track
whether it was incorporated in GHC or not. the idea is that GHC should be
extended to be able to write out dependencies list built in the --make
mode. Then rather simple
Hello GHC,
i'm interested to know how much people are interested in having
support for distributed compilation by GHC?
it's true that production GHC version doesn't support multi-threaded
compilation, so such system will be of benefit even for local usage
for users with multi-core chips
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Joel,
Thursday, April 5, 2007, 1:33:27 PM, you wrote:
my sentence should be read as is it true...? - i had lost a track
whether it was incorporated in GHC or not. the idea is that GHC should be
extended to be able to write out dependencies list built in the --make
Hello Simon,
Thursday, April 5, 2007, 4:12:15 PM, you wrote:
whether it was incorporated in GHC or not. the idea is that GHC should be
extended to be able to write out dependencies list built in the --make
mode. Then rather simple scripts may be used to distribute the work
among many
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Simon,
Thursday, April 5, 2007, 4:12:15 PM, you wrote:
whether it was incorporated in GHC or not. the idea is that GHC should be
extended to be able to write out dependencies list built in the --make
mode. Then rather simple scripts may be used to distribute the
Simon Marlow wrote:
This is one reason I wrote the 'setup makefile' patch for Cabal[1]
recently.
I haven't seen that patch show up in the cabal tree yet. Do you plan to
commit it? I'd love to see it in.
b
___
Glasgow-haskell-users
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 10:47:39AM -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
Simon Marlow wrote:
This is one reason I wrote the 'setup makefile' patch for Cabal[1]
recently.
I haven't seen that patch show up in the cabal tree yet. Do you plan to
commit it? I'd love to see it in.
Coincidentally,
