Dear GHC supporters,
I have made ghc-6.4 from source by binary itself
(Linux, Debian 3.1):
cd ghc/6.4/ghc-6.4/
./configure --prefix=foo
make
make install
But it is so hard to obtain documentation! I triedmake html
(in the same directory). It reports
mechvel:
Dear GHC supporters,
I have made ghc-6.4 from source by binary itself
(Linux, Debian 3.1):
cd ghc/6.4/ghc-6.4/
./configure --prefix=foo
make
make install
But it is so hard to obtain documentation! I triedmake html
(in the same directory). It reports
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 08:37:07PM +1000, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
mechvel:
Dear GHC supporters,
I have made ghc-6.4 from source by binary itself
[..]
But it is so hard to obtain documentation!
[..]
...
Why not provide, say, a couple of ready .ps files for user guide
Hi,
On 6/1/05, Serge D. Mechveliani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear GHC supporters,
rm -f -rf users_guide/
stringparam base.dir users_guide/ \
--stringparam use.id.as.filename 1 \
--stringparam html.stylesheet fptools.css \
--stringparam toc.section.depth
I can't build the library's Haddock documentation anymore:
the process fails claiming that Control/Arrow-raw.hs would
be missing. I've had this problem for a while now. Does
anybody else see this?
Peter
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
On 01 Feb 2005 10:32:14 +0100, Peter Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't build the library's Haddock documentation anymore:
the process fails claiming that Control/Arrow-raw.hs would
be missing. I've had this problem for a while now. Does
anybody else see this?
Yes, I do too. No solution,
On 01 February 2005 10:33, Ben Horsfall wrote:
On 01 Feb 2005 10:32:14 +0100, Peter Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't build the library's Haddock documentation anymore:
the process fails claiming that Control/Arrow-raw.hs would
be missing. I've had this problem for a while now. Does
