Re: possible alternative to libFFI

2009-05-18 Thread Simon Marlow
On 16/05/2009 19:31, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: Hello glasgow-haskell-users, http://www.nongnu.org/cinvoke/faq.html Is there a good reason to want an alternative to libffi? libffi works pretty well, and seems to be widely used and supported. Cheers, Simon

Re[2]: possible alternative to libFFI

2009-05-18 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Simon, Monday, May 18, 2009, 3:15:51 PM, you wrote: Is there a good reason to want an alternative to libffi? libffi works pretty well, and seems to be widely used and supported. no, i don't have any objections against libffi. it was just for information -- Best regards, Bulat

possible alternative to libFFI

2009-05-16 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello glasgow-haskell-users, http://www.nongnu.org/cinvoke/faq.html -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulat.zigans...@gmail.com ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org

Re: possible alternative to libFFI

2009-05-16 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 22:31 +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: Hello glasgow-haskell-users, http://www.nongnu.org/cinvoke/faq.html From the page: How does C/Invoke compare to libFFI? At the C API level they're pretty similar, aside from some minor quibbles. libFFI