On 16/05/2009 19:31, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello glasgow-haskell-users,
http://www.nongnu.org/cinvoke/faq.html
Is there a good reason to want an alternative to libffi? libffi works
pretty well, and seems to be widely used and supported.
Cheers,
Simon
Hello Simon,
Monday, May 18, 2009, 3:15:51 PM, you wrote:
Is there a good reason to want an alternative to libffi? libffi works
pretty well, and seems to be widely used and supported.
no, i don't have any objections against libffi. it was just for
information
--
Best regards,
Bulat
Hello glasgow-haskell-users,
http://www.nongnu.org/cinvoke/faq.html
--
Best regards,
Bulat mailto:bulat.zigans...@gmail.com
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 22:31 +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello glasgow-haskell-users,
http://www.nongnu.org/cinvoke/faq.html
From the page:
How does C/Invoke compare to libFFI?
At the C API level they're pretty similar, aside from some minor
quibbles. libFFI