On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 02:02:13PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
... actually I've just looked at the code and it looks wrong, aargh!
The finalizer is attached to the wrong side. If you have a source tree
handy, try changing the following line in libraries/base/GHC/Handle.hs:
addMVarFinalizer
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 02:37:03AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 06:13:27AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
Thanks, I've started brewing up a tree and I'll take that for a spin
when it's done cooking.
ouch! jadetex needs an upgrade (ghc debian
Sure enough, after I say that all my fd reaping issues are solved at
the Haskell level, I've been bitten by issues that look like the RTS
doing things behind my back wrt. reaping fd's etc. etc.
Basically, while I used socketToHandle the fd's got closed
prematurely,
and once I eliminated
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 02:02:13PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
... actually I've just looked at the code and it looks wrong, aargh!
The finalizer is attached to the wrong side. If you have a source tree
handy, try changing the following line in libraries/base/GHC/Handle.hs:
addMVarFinalizer
perhaps this is related to these errors i get after my program runs for
a while (about 2 days):
I am guessing the no such protocol entry is because it cant open the
/etc/protocols file due to a lack of fds. it is almost as if file
descriptors are not being closed and leaking over time...
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 03:06:48AM -0800, John Meacham wrote:
perhaps this is related to these errors i get after my program runs for
a while (about 2 days):
I am guessing the no such protocol entry is because it cant open the
/etc/protocols file due to a lack of fds. it is almost as if file
Sure enough, after I say that all my fd reaping issues are solved at
the Haskell level, I've been bitten by issues that look like the RTS
doing things behind my back wrt. reaping fd's etc. etc.
Basically, while I used socketToHandle the fd's got closed prematurely,
and once I eliminated all uses
