Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 13:17 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
Duncan Coutts wrote:
I had in mind allowing -package-conf to specify either a directory or
a file, with the obvious interpretation.
I think that's how I did a version of this patch a year or so ago.
My apologies
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 13:17 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Duncan Coutts wrote:
>
> > Attached is the current patch I'm testing.
>
> I think I've said in the past that in principle I like the idea. I'll
> commit your patch.
Great.
> In terms of making this a feature we advertise in the document
Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 21:41 +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
>
>> I'm somewhat tempted to patch our current ghc to do this, it might be
>> easier to get that working than to get our current hacks to work
>> properly.
>
> Attached is the current patch I'm test
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 21:41 +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> I'm somewhat tempted to patch our current ghc to do this, it might be
> easier to get that working than to get our current hacks to work
> properly.
Attached is the current patch I'm testing.
It's pretty minimal. It doesn't convert everyt
All,
Yet again I've got annoyed by the difficulties with the way ghc
registers packages. It's hard to get right.
This time I had someone testing hdbc-odbc for me on ppc64. He
uninstalled ghc and reinstalled it (to pick up a fix I had made) then he
found that building hdbc-odbc failed because the
