Dear GHC (pre-4.07-i386-unknown-linux),
I am going to use the profiling to measure the parts of certain
large program. To understand things, I start with simple example:
main =
let lgft :: Integer - Int
lgft n = _scc_ "length n!" (length $ show $ product [2..n])
ls =
Ok, here's my proposal for the version numbering issue. I think we should
bite the bullet and fix the numbering scheme to something sensible now, even
though it means changing version 4.07 to be called 4.08. Any objections?
I suggest the policy should be:
Stable releases are named
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 04:38:21 -0700, Simon Marlow wrote:
Ok, here's my proposal for the version numbering issue. I think we should
bite the bullet and fix the numbering scheme to something sensible now, even
though it means changing version 4.07 to be called 4.08. Any objections?
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
Ok, here's my proposal for the version numbering issue. I think we should
bite the bullet and fix the numbering scheme to something sensible now, even
though it means changing version 4.07 to be called 4.08. Any objections?
The scheme is good -
Michael Weber wrote:
Is there a reason, why omitting z if zero? Making the version number
*always* a triple "x.yy.z" is a) more consistent, b) easier to parse
(you can rely on having three dot-separated fields and c) additionally
a good break, since version numbers up to now are only pairs
