Hi all,
I am trying to create graphical profile information via +RTS -px and
then ghcprof .prof.
However, the uDraw application (former: daVinci) complains: "Option
-startappl requires exactly two arguments ( )".
Any idea?
Thanks,
Bernd
___
Glasgow-has
Hello,
I get the following error when building ghc 6.4 on Solaris 9.
Any ideas how to solve this ?
Thanks in advance.
Martin
...
grep -v '^#pragma GCC' | \
sed -e 's/""//g' -e 's/:[ ]*,/: /g' >package.conf.installed
../utils/ghc-pkg/ghc-pkg-inplace --force --update-package
http://www.haskel
Feature Requests item #1084122, was opened at 2004-12-12 17:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358032&aid=1084122&group_id=8032
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted
On 13 April 2005 14:00, Bernd Holzmüller wrote:
> I am trying to create graphical profile information via +RTS -px and
> then ghcprof .prof.
> However, the uDraw application (former: daVinci) complains: "Option
> -startappl requires exactly two arguments ( )".
> Any idea?
You might be the first p
ghcprof should be adapted to the new release of uDraw(Graph)
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/uDrawGraph
Who maintains ghcprof? (What has cgprof to do with it?)
Christian
Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 13 April 2005 14:00, Bernd Holzmüller wrote:
>
>>I am trying to create graphical profile inform
Oops, cgprof is a program used internally by ghcprof. Just shows how much I
know about it!
Cheers,
Simon
On 13 April 2005 16:37, Christian Maeder wrote:
> ghcprof should be adapted to the new release of uDraw(Graph)
> http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/uDrawGraph
>
> Who maintains gh
Hi all,
I have a question about IO in a STM transaction.
I want to make an atomic algorithm that does the following:
1. read an IORef
2. write some changes to the value you get from 1
3. save the IORef again
Currently, I did this, roughly like this:
doSomething :: IORef [s] -> s -> IO ()
doSomethin
On 4/13/05, Robert van Herk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question about IO in a STM transaction.
>
> I want to make an atomic algorithm that does the following:
>
> 1. read an IORef
> 2. write some changes to the value you get from 1
> 3. save the IORef again
>
> Currently,
You probably wanna use TVars instead of IORefs.
I would suggest reading the STM paper at
research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/papers/stm/stm.ps, if you haven't
already.
ah, I read about them, and than forgot all about them again :-). Guess
will have to read about 'em again.
Thanks!
Robert
