Hello Seth,
Tuesday, September 19, 2006, 3:35:54 AM, you wrote:
> I'm having trouble coming up with even a credible theory of what
> might be happening. I can't come up with any theory, no matter how
> far fetched, that would account for things working with 6.4.1 and not working
> with 6.4.2.
Hello glasgow-haskell-users,
i've put my hands on the ghc 6.6/mingw32 dated 1st september
(http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/dist/ghc-6.5.20060901-i386-unknown-mingw32.tar.gz)
overall, compilation of my 5 kloc application was fine. on the
6.2->6.4 transition, i was bitten by two API changes
Hello Simon,
Monday, September 4, 2006, 1:16:22 PM, you wrote:
>> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/docs/users_guide/ghc-language-features.html
>> still don't mention -fparr option :)
> -fparr is definitely not working in 6.6, so documenting it would almost
> certainly be a bad idea.
it d
Hello Ian,
Friday, September 8, 2006, 5:52:57 AM, you wrote:
> Both fixed, thanks.
Thanks to you - owing to your work this version Release Notes is much
more useful for ghc users which don't track development process. now
it contains exhaustive information about all ghc improvements
together wit
And what would rotating an Integer mean? The only sensible
interpretation I can think of is to make it behave like shift.
On Sep 18, 2006, at 23:46 , Peter Tanski wrote:
Welcome back! Since Data.Bits is not defined in the Haskell 1998
standard, are we free to change the implementation of D
Simon Marlow schrieb:
> Only a week late, we are pleased to announce the Release Candidate phase
> for GHC 6.6.
>
> Snapshots beginning with 6.5.20060831 are release candidates for 6.6
>
> Download snapshots from here:
>
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/dist/
I've downloaded the
Hello glasgow-haskell-users,
how about adding to the list of extra libs the following very useful ones:
regex-*
FilePath
MissingH
Edison
?
--
Best regards,
Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing li
Hi,
While I'd dearly love for FilePath to go in, the API is not quite
stable enough yet - I have another few API changes that I need to make
before I send out another version that is suitable for inclusion to
base, so i'd like to make those changes first, have another round of
review etc. then go
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:33:46PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> 3. ghc 6.6 includes smart relinking capability which don't relink exe
> file if it already exists and .hs source files was not changed. that's
> great but ignores other .o files that can be also linked to program,
> for example thos
I don't have a particular implementation in mind but as a general
idea it would make the treatment of Integers the same as the
treatment of the standard-size bounded ints. A possible
implementation might be a stream cipher that uses 128-bit Integers
instead of 32-bit ints (bitwise rotation
"Tomasz Zielonka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> BTW. The -fno-recomp option has a very unintuitive name, at least for
> me. When I see "-fno-recomp", my brain thinks "no recompilation",
> meaning "no unneccesary recompilation", which is what --make does by
> d
Is there anyway to turn off that ghci runs in threaded mode on windows?
fps 0.8 (and software that uses fps) triggers trac error #806.
This means that I cannot run such things interactively :-(
Rene.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-ha
Hi,
Welcome back! Since Data.Bits is not defined in the Haskell 1998
standard, are we free to change the implementation of Data.Bits?
No! If you do things like this, randomly changing the semantics of
functions, people will come round to your house with burning pitch
forks!
If you want to ha
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:13:56PM +0200, Rene de Visser wrote:
> I would suggest -fforce-recomp for force recompilation.
I like it.
Best regards
Tomasz
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mail
On 9/19/06, Peter Tanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't have a particular implementation in mind but as a general
idea it would make the treatment of Integers the same as the
treatment of the standard-size bounded ints. A possible
implementation might be a stream cipher that uses 128-bit Int
On Sep 19, 2006, at 3:38 PM, Lemmih wrote:
On 9/19/06, Peter Tanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't have a particular implementation in mind but as a general
idea it would make the treatment of Integers the same as the
treatment of the standard-size bounded ints. A possible
implementation m
On Sep 19, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi,
Welcome back! Since Data.Bits is not defined in the Haskell 1998
standard, are we free to change the implementation of Data.Bits?
No! If you do things like this, randomly changing the semantics of
functions, people will come round to you
Hello Neil,
Tuesday, September 19, 2006, 9:22:33 PM, you wrote:
> While I'd dearly love for FilePath to go in, the API is not quite
> stable enough yet
it's not problem by itself - ext libs should just contain most useful
libs that are preinstalled with ghc itself. one can easily upgrade them
-
On 19.09 21:28, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:13:56PM +0200, Rene de Visser wrote:
> > I would suggest -fforce-recomp for force recompilation.
>
-frecompile-all
- Einar Karttunen
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-hask
19 matches
Mail list logo