Re: What happened to -optdep option?

2016-05-05 Thread Bertram Felgenhauer
Volker Wysk wrote: > Hello! > > I'm using GHC 7.10.3 after an upgrade. I have the following in my Makefile: > > depend_mod :: lib/abh > ghc -M $(CFLAGS_GHC_0) -dep-makefile -optdepbuild/depend.tmp > -dep-suffix "p_" You should drop the -optdep here > \ > $(foreach m,

What happened to -optdep option?

2016-05-05 Thread Volker Wysk
Hello! I'm using GHC 7.10.3 after an upgrade. I have the following in my Makefile: depend_mod :: lib/abh ghc -M $(CFLAGS_GHC_0) -dep-makefile -optdepbuild/depend.tmp -dep-suffix "p_" \ $(foreach m, $(MOD_HS) $(PROG_HS), src/$(m).hs) \ $(foreach m,

Looking for GHC compile-time performance tests

2016-05-05 Thread Ben Gamari
tl;dr. Do you have a Haskell project which GHC now compiles more slowly than in the past? If you would like to see your program's compilation time improve in 8.2, reduce it to a minimal testcase, and provide it to us via Trac. Good news everyone, GHC 8.2 will be a release

Re: Looking for GHC compile-time performance tests

2016-05-05 Thread Edward Kmett
vector-algorithms has gotten slower to both compile and for users rather consistently during each release throughout the 7.x lifecycle. That may serve as a good torture test as well. > On May 6, 2016, at 6:22 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > Ben Gamari wrote: > >> So,

Re: Looking for GHC compile-time performance tests

2016-05-05 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Ben Gamari wrote: > So, if you would like to see your program's compilation time improve > in GHC 8.2, put some time into reducing it to something minimal, submit > it to us via a Trac ticket, and let us know in this thread. The vector package is probably a good candidate. Compling vector slowed

Re: Looking for GHC compile-time performance tests

2016-05-05 Thread Carter Schonwald
It also helped that the test suite got added back to the main cabal. And the test suite took a WHILE, due to some sort of coercion seize blowup that I think was fixed in 8,0. But yes. Definitely vector build times decayed. Partly due to the shift to the general bundle rep, and partly due to ...

Re: Looking for GHC compile-time performance tests

2016-05-05 Thread David Feuer
containers compile times have generally gotten slower from version to version. On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Ben Gamari wrote: > >> So, if you would like to see your program's compilation time improve >> in GHC 8.2, put some time into reducing

RE: Looking for GHC compile-time performance tests

2016-05-05 Thread Simon Peyton Jones
Thanks. A repeatable test case would be incredibly helpful here. Simon | -Original Message- | From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users- | boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Edward Kmett | Sent: 05 May 2016 21:50 | To: Erik de Castro Lopo | Cc:

Re: What happened to -optdep option?

2016-05-05 Thread Volker Wysk
Hello! Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2016, 00:35:01 CEST schrieb Bertram Felgenhauer: > Volker Wysk wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I'm using GHC 7.10.3 after an upgrade. I have the following in my > > Makefile: > > > > depend_mod :: lib/abh > > > > ghc -M $(CFLAGS_GHC_0) -dep-makefile