RE: Straightforward conversion from Int - Word

If intToNat is a blunt instrument, then fromIntegral is the rapier :-) Remember Word is GHC-specific; the FFI doesn't define it. Simon -Original Message- From: Julian Seward (Intl Vendor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 February 2002 16:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

RE: Doubts in GHC

I´m new in this list and I think that it´s a very good idea, because we can show our doubts. I have a doubt in GHC: How can we include a folder in the compiling process? Example: If one file called main.hs requires some others modules that are in one folder, how can compile it

RE: Building ghc-5.00.2 from .hc files

I have tried do build ghc-5.00.2 from .hc files. I run ditrib/hc-build, but it fails: -- -- ===fptools== Finished making `all' in cbits ... PWD = /tmp/ghc-5.00.2/hslibs/lang

Re: Straightforward conversion from Int - Word

Simon Marlow notes: But fromIntegral *does* do the right thing, doesn't it? Numeric.showHex (fromIntegral (-1 :: Int32) :: Word32) 0x Interesting. The fact that this fooled Julian as well as me suggests the behavior needs to be better documented. Interestingly, hugs yields

SGI-Port // Mnagler-Gcc Interface...

Hello: I'm trying to run GHC in a mips-SGI-irix platform, more accurately Irix 6. The last binary version avalaible (ftp://ftp.dcs.glasgow.ac.uk/pub/haskell/glasgow/) is for ghc-2.10 (ghc-2.10-mips-sgi-irix6.tar.gz) . In order to reach the actual ghc-5-XX step by step, I will start by porting

problem compiling GUM

Hi all, I'm not sure if this is the appropriate place to ask about this, but there's no GPH mailing list. I recently downloaded the source for GUM-4.06-291100 and am having difficulty getting it to compile. The complaint it gives is: utils/Argv.lhs: can't locate import `Addr' ghc: 1972928