IOError vs. Exception vs. IOException

2002-10-31 Thread Ross Paterson
Shouldn't IOError be identified with IOException rather than Exception? ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

RE: problem generating Core with no-implicit-prelude

2002-10-31 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
It is a bug... we weren't printing enough in -fext-core. I think it's fixed now. (I'm away till Monday.) Simon | -Original Message- | From: Hal Daume III [mailto:hdaume;ISI.EDU] | Sent: 29 October 2002 17:57 | To: GHC Users Mailing List | Subject: problem generating Core with

Re: IOError vs. Exception vs. IOException

2002-10-31 Thread Alastair Reid
Ross Paterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] cryptically writes: Shouldn't IOError be identified with IOException rather than Exception? I had to grovel through the code to understand what this question means. It seems that GHC.IOBase contains these definitions: type IOError = Exception data