Can GHC be invoked somehow via the #! mechanism? Put another way, is
there a GHC analogue to runhugs?
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
In ghc/compiler/main/DriverFlags.hs machdepCCOpts includes a -static
flag for some arches. Is this really necessary? I can't see
any comments
as to why, nor any real answers from a quick google.
I can't remember why either.
It causes this when compiling darcs on these arches:
On Sat, Mar 06 2004, Dean Herington wrote:
Can GHC be invoked somehow via the #! mechanism? Put another way, is
there a GHC analogue to runhugs?
Well, ghc now has an -e flag to evaluate stuff directly from the prompt
(e.g. ghc -e Main.main Main.hs). But you can't execute shell-scripts
from a
Can GHC be invoked somehow via the #! mechanism? Put another way, is
there a GHC analogue to runhugs?
Almost, but not quite. Since 6.2, GHC has the -e switch for invoking
expressions from the command line, which gets a step closer. GHC
doesn't ignore the '#!' line yet, but I can add that.
On Sat, Mar 06 2004, Dean Herington wrote:
Can GHC be invoked somehow via the #! mechanism? Put
another way, is
there a GHC analogue to runhugs?
Well, ghc now has an -e flag to evaluate stuff directly from
the prompt
(e.g. ghc -e Main.main Main.hs). But you can't execute
On Mon, Mar 08 2004, Simon Marlow wrote:
However, I just tried it on a recent Linux (RedHat 9) and it seems to
accept nested #! scripts.
It doesn't work for me though (it tries to run the first script (the
Haskell module) with the interpreter for the second script (bash).
Anyway, one cannot
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:07:07AM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
It causes this when compiling darcs on these arches:
/usr/lib/ghc-6.2/libHSunix.a(User.o)(.text+0x2a2c): In
function `s6T9_ret':
: warning: Using 'getgrgid_r' in statically linked
applications requires at
I needed a list which could handle items of different types for the
database code I am writing. I have written a module implementing such a
list based on dependant types (from Conor McBride: Faking It; Simulating
Depandant Types in Haskell). Although McBride does not mention
lists/vectors with
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:25:06PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:07:07AM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
What platform? Does everything work if you remove the -static?
alpha, powerpc and hppa so far. I expect the same will happen for mips
and mipsel.
If, on powerpc,
I would like to see your code indeed ...
it seems the attachment was missing.
Anyway, I am not sure if it obvious or not,
but heterogenously typed lists can be nicely
modelled with Data.Typeable (!!!) I guess we
should add something like this to the module?
See
Didn't know If I should post it straight away... its quite long and I dont do
attachments (well not If I can help it. I am aware Dynamic can model heterogenious
lists
(thanks for correct terminology) - but I need static typing. Thats the clever thing
about
this code - the list is heterogenious
What platform? Does everything work if you remove the -static?
alpha, powerpc and hppa so far. I expect the same will happen for mips
and mipsel.
If, on powerpc, I run the final link command without -static
(that's the
only place it should make a difference, right?) then it links without
warnings
12 matches
Mail list logo
