Re: Performance: Faster to define a function writing out all arguments?

Hi And strangely enough on my machine 1) is faster by a few percent than Consider a few percent to be noise. It may not really be a faster result, and it may not have anything to do with what you wrote. A few percent might seem unimportant, but I am currently developing my Haskell style.

Re: problem with concurrent port scanner

HP Wei wrote: I cut and paste the code from http://blog.moertel.com/articles/2004/03/13/concurrent-port-scanner-in-haskell And compiled the resulting portscan.hs with both ghc-6.8.2 and ghc-6.6.1 on a host with Sun-Sparc [SunOS 5.10]. Besides the issue of binary-code-size blow-up with

Re: Performance: Faster to define a function writing out all arguments?

alexander.fuchs: Hi there, I am trying to write my first serious Haskell program, but have problems understanding 'strange' performance results. It seems to be a ghc specific question, so I am asking here. In a happy parser I have this code 1): %monad { Parsed } { thenP } { returnP }