On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:08:58PM -0700, Tim Chevalier wrote:
I'm not surprised that building the libraries with ticky enabled
doesn't work, because when I fixed ticky-ticky profiling a year and a
half ago after it was bit-rotted, I hardly tested it and all and
certainly didn't try building
On 7/20/08, Andrew Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right--thing is, it seemed I was getting linker errors on compiling
the *libraries*--which seems weird, given that the libraries shouldn't
be getting linked, should they? I'm not entirely sure this is what I
was seeing, so, well, not a
Johan Tibell wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to everyone who turned up and joined in, we had an interesting
discussion about the HLP. On this basis I think we should try making it a
weekly event.
Thanks for arranging the meeting. I
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian and I talked about possibly trying a different time - 9pm UK time, which
would be slightly less friendly to us in the UK (I have my work/life balance
to think about you know :-) but more friendly to people in the US.
I
Hello,
I was wresting with the problem of converting our type witness code in darcs
to work with ghc 6.8 and it occurred to me that someone has probably
document the change somewhere. In particular, I'm seeing this error message
a lot, but 6.6 doesn't give this message:
GADT pattern match in
Ian and I talked about possibly trying a different time - 9pm UK time,
which would be slightly less friendly to us in the UK (I have my work/life
balance to think about you know :-) but more friendly to people in the US.
I, for one, am happy with the current time; changing it should always be
