Peter Hercek wrote:
As for as the rest of the message. Those are possible bugs.
If I can reduce them to few tens of lines of a test, I'll
post the bug reports. I use Archlinux and the last (non-testing)
version of ghc there is ghc-6.8.2. Do you accept bug reports
against it or do you need
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Dagit wrote:
Thanks. This helps a lot. Mind if I put it somewhere, such as on the
wiki?
A good description of how to deal with exceptions would be great to have in
the Haddock documentation for Control.Exception -
==
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.10.1
==
The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new major release of GHC. There
have been a number of
Hello fellow GHC users,
Ian Lynagh wrote:
==
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.10.1
==
[snip]
How to get it
~
The easy way
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 23:51, David Menendez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Philip K.F. Hölzenspies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have now implemented my variable as a pair of MVars, one of which serves as
a lock on the other. Both for performance reasons and for
Simon Marlow wrote:
Peter Hercek wrote:
As for as the rest of the message. Those are possible bugs.
If I can reduce them to few tens of lines of a test, I'll
post the bug reports. I use Archlinux and the last (non-testing)
version of ghc there is ghc-6.8.2. Do you accept bug reports
Jason Dagit wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:24 AM, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Dagit wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johannes Waldmann wrote:
with 6.10, the following does not typecheck:
foo `Control.Exception.catch` \ _ - return
It is true that STM's TMVars (which are TVar (Maybe _)) allow atomic readTMVar.
They are not a great replacement for MVars for serious performance reasons.
MVars have wake one semantics: There can be many threads stopped and waiting
on a particular MVar to be filled/emptied. These are
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to get it
~
The easy way is to go to the web page, which should be self-explanatory:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/
We supply binary builds in the native package format for many
platforms, and the
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:41:58 +0900, Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
action
`catches`
[ \(e :: ExitCode) - ...
, \(e :: PatternMatchFail) - ...
]
or just by using multiple catch clauses:
action
`catch` (\(e :: ExitCode) - ...)
`catch` (\(e ::
Jason Dagit:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to get it
~
The easy way is to go to the web page, which should be self-
explanatory:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/
We supply binary builds in the native package format for many
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Dagit:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to get it
~
The easy way is to go to the web page, which should be self-explanatory:
On 2008 Nov 4, at 20:26, Jason Dagit wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Dagit:
I'm on OSX and I currently have ghc-6.6.1 and ghc-6.8.3 (installed
from a pkg). I would like to add ghc-6.10.1 to my system. I tried
to
do this with RC1
13 matches
Mail list logo
