Yes we are. If you aren't using the FFI or unsafe things, you should not get a
seg fault. Do help us to reproduce it -- thanks.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: glasgow-haskell-bugs-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-bugs-
| boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Serge D. Mechvel
2009/1/23 Austin Seipp :
>
> The code is attached to this message; the problem is in the normalize
> function:
>
>> normalize :: (Modular s a, Integral a) => a -> M s a
>> normalize a = M (mod a (modulus (u :: s)))
"s" isn't scoped over the definition of "normalize" in this
definition. You need an
Hi,
I've been reading Oleg Kiselyov's "Implicit Configurations" paper and
while getting the modulus math code to work I've hit a bit of a
problem.
The code is attached to this message; the problem is in the normalize
function:
> normalize :: (Modular s a, Integral a) => a -> M s a
> normalize a
Hi Pepe,
Thanks for the confirmation. I added the ticket:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2976
Peter.
Pepe Iborra wrote:
Hi Peter,
It looks like a bug to me too.
I tested it and 6.6 displays the correct behaviour, while 6.8.1 shows
the bug. You should open a ticket if you haven't d
Dear GHC team,
I `make' my (large) project in ghc-6.10.1, Linux Debian, i386-unknown,
run the executable, and obtain
Segmentation fault.
Then, I noted that in a few places the compiler warned about skipping
some class member implementations in some instances.
I added these implementations,
Hi Peter,
It looks like a bug to me too.
I tested it and 6.6 displays the correct behaviour, while 6.8.1 shows
the bug. You should open a ticket if you haven't done so yet.
Cheers,
pepe
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Peter Hercek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bindings displayed with ":show bindings" do n
