From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org
[mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf
Of Alexander Dunlap
An exception to this rule is that we will probably also
rebundle time in
the bindists, as that has little chance of breaking anything else.
Would this be
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 18:55 -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
Hi Ian,
thanks for the update on plans and the willingness to jump in and do another
release cycle so soon after 6.10.2. The suggested fixes seem agreeable to
me, but I have one _minor_ additional request for 6.10.3 if you end having
On 4/23/2009 02:05, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 18:55 -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
Hi Ian,
thanks for the update on plans and the willingness to jump in and do another
release cycle so soon after 6.10.2. The suggested fixes seem agreeable to
me, but I have one _minor_
John Goerzen wrote:
Ahn, Ki Yung wrote:
I don't know the exact reason but this should not fail since I have
Debian packaged ghc 6.10.1 and OpenGL-2.2.1.1 on my system.
I think this is because the filename of the OpenGL shared library is
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1 rather than libGL.so. This is why
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 05:59 -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
On 4/23/2009 02:05, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 18:55 -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
Hi Ian,
thanks for the update on plans and the willingness to jump in and do
another
release cycle so soon after 6.10.2. The
Ahn, Ki Yung kya...@gmail.com writes:
I think this is because the filename of the OpenGL shared library is
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1 rather than libGL.so.
No. Do not manually create the symlink. It sounds like you don't
have the -dev packages for OpenGL installed.
I do already have the dev
