I'm thinking it would be expedient to omit Haddock while building a
ghc 6.11 snapshot, per bug ticket #3531
From my basic understanding of its purpose there, that ought to work out
fine - I mean, not to undervalue documentation, but the compiler should
be able to function without it. But not
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 07:34:53AM -0700, Donn Cave wrote:
I'm thinking it would be expedient to omit Haddock while building a
ghc 6.11 snapshot, per bug ticket #3531
From my basic understanding of its purpose there, that ought to work out
fine - I mean, not to undervalue documentation, but
