Too late. We had a stable link, I used it, Google used it, blog posts
were written that linked to it, I've emailed my wife links to it, I've
put them in Word documents, I've posted them on internal intranets.
You can't create a link, put content behind it, then move the content
- it just breaks
Hi all,
I have a bug report [1] for haskell-src-exts pertaining to the use of
qualified names in import specifications, e.g.
module Main where
import Foo (Bar.bar)
GHC apparently accepts this code, but I can find no mention of such a
feature in the GHC docs.
Personally I don't see why this
This discussion definitely does not belong on the
Haskell-Beginners list. Besides not being a topic
for beginners, being there is keeping it under the
radar of many or most of the people who work on
these things in Haskell.
I am moving the discussion to the GHC users list,
as suggested by
module Main where
import Foo (Bar.bar)
GHC apparently accepts this code, but I can find no mention of such a
feature in the GHC docs.
It certainly is an extension beyond Haskell'98 and Haskell 2010, which
do not permit qualified names in import lists. I cannot think for any
use for such
On Monday 28 December 2009 12:56:17 Yitzchak Gale wrote:
This discussion definitely does not belong on the
Haskell-Beginners list. Besides not being a topic
for beginners, being there is keeping it under the
radar of many or most of the people who work on
these things in Haskell.
I am
If ghc really does accept the example given, I would like to know what
entity Bar.bar refers to, since it cannot possibly be exported by Foo.
In this example Bar exports bar, and Foo re-exports module Bar.
/Niklas
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Jon Harrop j...@ffconsultancy.com wrote:
On Monday 28 December 2009 12:56:17 Yitzchak Gale wrote:
This discussion definitely does not belong on the
Haskell-Beginners list. Besides not being a topic
for beginners, being there is keeping it under the
radar of
I've now updated Hoogle to point at the new links. I still think the
old link's should be restored (perhaps as a permanent redirect code?),
but at least it doesn't break Hoogle now.
Thanks, Neil
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Malcolm Wallace
malcolm.wall...@cs.york.ac.uk wrote:
Too late. We
Hi!
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Neil Mitchell ndmitch...@gmail.com wrote:
I've now updated Hoogle to point at the new links. I still think the
old link's should be restored (perhaps as a permanent redirect code?),
but at least it doesn't break Hoogle now.
+1
I all the time get to 404
