As one of the few people who has habitually used Haskell'98 wherever possible,
I favour plan A. As I recently discovered, in ghc 7 it is already very fragile
to attempt to depend on both the base and haskell98 packages simultaneously.
In most cases it simply doesn't work. Removing those few
Simon Peyton-Jones, if you say:
Under Plan A, some Hackage packages will become un-compilable,
and will require source code changes to fix them. I do not have
any idea how many Hackage packages would fail in this way.
If you don't have any idea how many Hackage packages would
On 17 June 2011 16:47, Simon Peyton-Jones simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
So: Under Plan A, some Hackage packages will become un-compilable,
and will require source code changes to fix them. I do not have
any idea how many Hackage packages would fail in this way.
Of the 372
