Ian,
The RC unfortunately doesn't build on Lion (OS X 10.7). It needs two patches I
recently pushed to the master branch (and suggested to be merged into stable).
They are the following patches:
eb01af6ba964fe74375e461723b83597ef97155d (On OS X, use gcc-4.2 with Xcode 4
and up)
I just thought of an additional consideration regarding this part of the
design space.
On 25/07/2011 2:02 PM, Edward Kmett wrote:
(I had said):
Here is another way to look at it: when you say
class LeftModule Whole m = Additive m
you are closer to specifying an *instance*
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 29.07.2011, 19:21 +0100 schrieb Ian Lynagh:
Please test as much as possible; bugs are much cheaper if we find them
before the release!
not a bug, but still: Could we get this fix into the package:
http://trac.haskell.org/haddock/ticket/176 and maybe also this flag
So when I upgrade from 6.10 to 6.12 a LONG time ago, there was a bug
where hsc2hs would emit INCLUDE pragmas and ghc didn't like that. So
I hacked around it with an extra grep -v step in the Makefile. I
always meant to go fix it for real in hsc2hs and finally I came back
to that TODO item. I
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 06:21:16PM +0200, Peter Hercek wrote:
Is it a bug? Should it be reported to the ghc trac database?
Please report it and we'll take a look.
Thanks
Ian
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
This is supposed to get defined as a command line argument to the preprocessor,
see compiler/main/DriverPipeline.hs. Are you saying you don't see it when you
run hsc2hs? Maybe someone else is calling a preprocessor but missing some of
these arguments...
Edward
On 07/30/2011 10:25 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 06:21:16PM +0200, Peter Hercek wrote:
Is it a bug? Should it be reported to the ghc trac database?
Please report it and we'll take a look.
Thanks
Ian
It is done:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5363
Peter.
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Edward Z. Yang ezy...@mit.edu wrote:
This is supposed to get defined as a command line argument to the
preprocessor,
see compiler/main/DriverPipeline.hs. Are you saying you don't see it when you
run hsc2hs? Maybe someone else is calling a preprocessor but
No, I don't think this diagnosis is correct. hsc2hs is outputting preprocessor
directives into hs files that GHC will then process. Inspect your .hs file,
at least for me, I don't see #INCLUDE pragmas output at all, with latest
hsc2hs (old versions just didn't output any ifdefs, so we'd hit the
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 09:10:21PM +, Evan Laforge wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Edward Z. Yang ezy...@mit.edu wrote:
This is supposed to get defined as a command line argument to the
preprocessor,
see compiler/main/DriverPipeline.hs. Are you saying you don't see it when
Hi All,
I thought I may as well try the same experiment 7.2.1-RC1 on completely
different hardware (a network v-server running CentOS 5 with ghc-6.12.3
installed) and indeed:
ghci
GHCi, version 7.2.0.20110728: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Loading package ghc-prim ... linking
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Edward Z. Yang ezy...@mit.edu wrote:
No, I don't think this diagnosis is correct. hsc2hs is outputting
preprocessor
directives into hs files that GHC will then process. Inspect your .hs file,
Not for me it's not, it's putting preprocessor directives into a C
12 matches
Mail list logo
