There is an effort underway to make Haskell's Records
better. The discussion is ongoing on the ghc-users mail
list, ...
in the direction of making the most minimal changes
possible to achieve some simple record name-spacing.
Thanks,
Greg Weber
Thank you Greg,
Yes I know, and I have been
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:02 PM, AntC
anthony_clay...@clear.net.nz wrote:
Ryan Newton rrnewton at gmail.com writes:
I admit I'm a big fan of polymorphic extension. But I
don't love it enough
for it to impede progress!
Records proposals for Haskell have repeatedly foundered
Dear ghc developers,
there seems to be a change in the C functions of ghc. How do we fix this? Is
there some guide as to what has changed?
Thanks,
Axel
Begin forwarded message:
From: Andriy Polishchuk andriy.s.polishc...@gmail.com
Date: 27. Januar 2012 03:36:50 MEZ
To:
Axel,
See my recent email to gtk2hs-users, I already proposed a fix for this.
28.01.2012, в 17:36, Axel Simon axel.si...@in.tum.de написал(а):
Dear ghc developers,
there seems to be a change in the C functions of ghc. How do we fix this? Is
there some guide as to what has changed?
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:57:35PM -0800, Evan Laforge wrote:
Unfortunately ghci still segfaults for me most times (the previous
release candidate did too). Anyone else seeing this? What should I
do to troubleshoot?
OS X 10.6.8, using GHC-7.4.0.20120126-x86_64.pkg
Ah, sorry, I should have
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:10:26PM -0600, Austin Seipp wrote:
Ian, can I ask what the procedure would be to check out the 7.4 branch
of GHC and all the associated libraries to try this out? I'm not
familiar with all the `sync-all`-fu, but I speculate it's what'll do
it. :)
See
Oh, ok, sorry, I didn't realize this was the same issue. Please ignore this
email then.
Axel
On 28.01.2012, at 14:40, Eugene Kirpichov wrote:
Axel,
See my recent email to gtk2hs-users, I already proposed a fix for this.
28.01.2012, в 17:36, Axel Simon axel.si...@in.tum.de
I installed it on my mac (OS X 10.7.2, XCode 4.1) without any issues (using
bindist, not pkg). Is upgrading to XCode 4.2 ok from GHC perspective (more
specifically, runtime performance of code compiled by GHC)? I have seen
some discussion of Clang causing issues for GHC, but it was about compiling
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Sanket Agrawal
sanket.agra...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason I am asking is I want to try LLVM backend but GHC keeps
complaining about missing llvm tools (opt, llc). I checked LLVM webpage but
couldn't find information about how to determine what llvm tools are
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Sanket Agrawal
sanket.agra...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason I am asking is I want to try LLVM backend but GHC keeps
complaining about missing llvm tools (opt, llc). I checked LLVM
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 09:52:13AM -0500, Sanket Agrawal wrote:
I installed it on my mac (OS X 10.7.2, XCode 4.1) without any issues (using
bindist, not pkg). Is upgrading to XCode 4.2 ok from GHC perspective
There is a problem with the LLVM gcc and GHC:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:15:46PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.4.1:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.4.1-rc2/
The first candidate or the second?
(for the date is Jan 27).
Is ghc-7.4.0.20111219 the first candidate?
On Jan 28, 2012 11:14 AM, Sanket Agrawal sanket.agra...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, that is another possibility. I would like to keep it simple, and
just upgrade to XCode 4.2, instead of installing Clang+LLVM binaries
separately, if it is not an issue for GHC.
Xcode 4.2 doesn't include full LLVM
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 08:32:31PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:15:46PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.4.1:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.4.1-rc2/
The first candidate or the second?
Ian,
Thanks for pointing this out.
I run XCode 4 (and haven't had the opportunity to upgrade.) Would it
be reasonable to make a binary distribution for people like Evan and
Me and hopefully have it put on the download page?
I presume the people in our boat are actually pretty small in number
15 matches
Mail list logo
