Hello,
According to the release notes there is a new package that now contains the
module Data.Array.Diff.
According to Ian's commit this package is called diffarray.
This package does not seem to be available on Hackage.
Could someone upload it?
Rene.
Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:20110729182136.ga2...@matrix.chaos.earth.li...
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.2.1:
Is it normal for the windows build to have 99 unexpected failures?
Hello,
Where is the documentation on how pinning works in the GHC garbage collector
(from a GHC users point of view).
I have copied the following code from array/IO.hs and am thinking that it is
assuming that the array is pinned? What triggers the pinning?
On a second note.
Why is the type
I suggest that the code in GHC.Arr be changed from
error Error in array index
to
error Error in array index ++ show b ++ show i
so that the bounds and offending index is shown. This is easy to do as the
information is already available, and would in most cases be of great help
to the user
One idea that occurred to us recently is this: GHCi could provide a
simplified version of the cost-centre-stack machinery *all the time*,
Simon
This still doesn't explain to me why
C:\Haskell\devmain +RTS -xc
gave
GHC.Arr.CAFmain: Error in array index
(This is with full profiling
The following link gives reasons for not generating via C
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=enlr=ie=UTF-8selm=4zp8kn7xe.fsf_-_%40beta.franz.com
Naturally a number of these are common lisp specific, however I think that
Haskell and GCC are quite semantically different, so using GCC might
seems that you don;t understand the situation. ghc compiles Haskell to
language called core, do almost all optimizations at level of this
language, then translates final result to the STG language from that
the C-- code is generated. changing the translation of STG can't
prevent ANY ghc
From: Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Rene,
i done reading. my question - is YOU read this? the lisp problems have
almost
nothing in common with haskell
It is a long time since i read this, but some things come to mind. Listed
below.
Maybe GHC should generate better C. I am
From: Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i answered in the original letter (search for Cray :)
Re-reading this, I see that you have a well defined goals that cover most of
my points.
seems that you don't seen the attached files. tail calls are optimized
in gcc
No I don't see any
Hello,
I tried to compile HAppS using the latest GHC snapshot (in compiles fine
with 6.41).
I for example get the error
/home/rene/repos/HAppS/src/HAppS/MACID/Var.hs:23:0:
Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: forall state event.
Ev state event
Simon Peyton-Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag |
| This gives the user possibility to redefine a certain part of the
| library instance.
| Is not ghc-6.4.1 better at this point?
Perhaps. That's what I'd like feedback about. What do others think?
...
Simon
What are the
Michael Marte [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im
Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello *,
I noticed a five percent speed up by making local definitions global.
Maybe the global defintions are monomorphic, and the local defintions
are polymorphic. You could evaluate the types of the global types
Tomasz Zielonka [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW. The -fno-recomp option has a very unintuitive name, at least for
me. When I see -fno-recomp, my brain thinks no recompilation,
meaning no unneccesary recompilation, which is what --make does by
default. Using
Is there anyway to turn off that ghci runs in threaded mode on windows?
fps 0.8 (and software that uses fps) triggers trac error #806.
This means that I cannot run such things interactively :-(
Rene.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
The flags under section
4.17.26. Compiler debugging options
seem to be out of date. They seem to be wrong for both 6.42 and 6.6
For example --ddump-cmm is not listed, but works.
But --ddump-absC is listed, and gives the error unknown flag.
I can't get -ddump-stix to work either.
Gone, or
Hello,
What do I need to install for the regex library support on MINGW?
It looks like the regex library needs the posix library, and in my MINGW /
MSYS installation I don't find one
(and neither does configure).
Rene.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users
Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/dist/
Hello Ian,
Is it on purpose that the lastest windows build does not include
cabal-install?
Since the September builds I don't see any logs for the mingw build?
Rene.
Brian Smith" [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im
Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On
9/30/06, Rene de Visser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What
do I need to install for the regex library support on MINGW?It looks
like the regex library needs the posix library, and in my
There may be a heuristic that would help more programs to go through... but
I prefer asking the programmer to make the desired behaviour explicit.
Simon
How can the user make this explicit?
With the
class C a b where
op :: a - a
instance C Int Int where
op a = -a
test d = op d
I vote for 6.8.
Rene.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
What are the plans for the esc branch?
Are the changing going to be merged?
Rene.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Hello,
I am attempting some genetic programming in Haskell.
Rather than defining my own data type for programs and writing my own
interpreter, I want to use the template haskell expression data types and
evaluate them with the rts's byte code interpreter. This gives me a nice
fast interpreter
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, by default we don't build or supply the GHC package with profiling,
because of the extra bloat it would add to the downloads and the time
taken to build it.
Why is a program so large when I use the GHC module?
What are the plans for http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5623 which
seems to be still open?
Quoting form the ticket ...
Just to spam a little more, it seems that the HEAD happily duplicates all
computations on unboxed types. It even duplicates x+x in this example:
foo :: Float - Float
24 matches
Mail list logo