I notice that many of the installed libs aren't required for learning
Haskell. What libs are required so I can get the bare minimum version of
GHC? Also, is there any automatic way so that I don't have to manually
delete the folders and edit package.conf?
--
View this message in context:
http://
Yes, I agree with both of you. But that is if I want to use Haskell as a
development tool. The target in learning by reinventing the wheel is the
ability to think declaratively when solving problems and to improve an
already found solution. For instance, Data.List module provides permutations
func
Currently, GHC distribution is VERY BIG (about 410 MB). 2 Things that I
noticed which contributed most of this problem are: libraries (about 220 MB)
and GCC and friends compiler (including perl, ar, as, ld, etc).
I'm a college student and I just want to learn functional programming with
Haskell. N
Bulat Ziganshin-2 wrote:
>
> 1. you can use winhugs - it's more user-friendly. and need only ~10mb
> in stripped installation
>
That's what I'm using for now, but I need GHC's compilation capability.
Bulat Ziganshin-2 wrote:
>
> 2. you can try to delete all the unneeded libs from ghc distro.
I try to build a lite version (e.g. no extra libs) of GHC 6.8.3, I'm using
MinGW GCC 4.2.1-2 with dwarf-2 exception and pre-compiled GHC 6.8.3. Here's
my configure:
sh configure --prefix=/c/ghc-new CFLAGS='-s -O2' LDFLAGS='-s -O2'
--with-gmp-includes=/usr/local/gmp/include
--with-gmp-libraries=/us
I notice that speed from code generated by -fasm and -fvia-C isn't
significant, furthermore -fvia-C takes longer time. So, why ghc still needs
gcc (at least on Windows)?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Is--fvia-C-still-needed--tp19663119p19663119.html
Sent from the Haskell
The reason why I don't like gcc shipped with ghc distribution is that I waste
my harddisk space for two same compilers, only differ in version (I use
4.3.2, ghc ships 3.4.2). And because both are in my PATH, it sometimes
behaves unexpectedly. For instance, I try to delete the shipped gcc because
I
> We could theoretically ship a cut-down GHC bundle with no gcc ...
What about shipping two versions? One with bundled MinGW and other without
> Having fully-functional-out-of-the-box GHC installers is very useful ...
Good idea.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Is--fvia
I think you miss something important here:
quickslop :: (Ord a) => [a] ->[a]
quickslop [] = []
quickslop (x:xs) =
quickslop [a | a <- xs, a <= x] ++ [x] ++ quickslop [b | b <- xs, b > x]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Newby-question-re-quicksort-tp23250159p23250345.
I've just installed 6.10.4 and try to rebuild a minimal version from source,
but the rebuild process failed. It stops with message:
Capability.c: error converting to pointer type
on stage1.
configure command:
./configure --prefix=/c/ghc CFLAGS=-O4 LDFLAGS=-s
--
View this message in context:
h
> I presume you're on Windows? MSYS or Cygwin? Which version of gcc?
MSYS 1.0.11 and MinGW GCC 4.4.0.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Failed-to-bootstrap-6.10.4-with-itself-on-Windows-%28MinGW%29-tp24599789p24620500.html
Sent from the Haskell - Glasgow-haskell-users mai
> I presume you're on Windows? MSYS or Cygwin? Which version of gcc?
MSYS 1.0.11 and MinGW GCC 4.4.0 (it's installed and on PATH it's put before
ghc, but I don't know whether ghc will use this one or the one bundled with
it).
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Failed-to-bo
OK, I've tried ghc's supplied gcc, too (not so easy, I need to set some
environment variables first) and here are the results:
With ghc's gcc:
D:/Sources/ghc/ghc-6.10.4/ghc/stage1-inplace/ghc.exe -package rts-1.0
-optc-O2 -
odir dist/build -c cbits/longlong.c -o dist/build/cbits/longlong.o
(echo
13 matches
Mail list logo
