On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:59 AM, I wrote:
My question on the ghc heap profiler on stack overflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5306717/how-should-i-interpret-the-output-of-the-ghc-heap-profiler
remains unanswered :-( Perhaps that's not the best forum. Is there someone
here prepared to
On Wednesday 23 March 2011 03:32:16, Tim Docker wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:59 AM, I wrote:
My question on the ghc heap profiler on stack overflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5306717/how-should-i-interpret-the-
output-of-the-ghc-heap-profiler
remains unanswered :-(
compact
representation) directly from the handle without going through an
intervening string format. Also, you'll be better off using a real parser
instead of read, which is very difficult to use robustly.
John L.
From: Tim Docker t...@dockerz.net
Subject: memory slop (was: Using the GHC heap
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Tim Docker t...@dockerz.net wrote:
Productivity 78.2% of total user, 76.5% of total elapsed
As a rule of thumb GC time should be less than 10%.
This seems strange. The maximum residency of 12MB sounds about correct for
my data. But what's with the 59MB of
documentation and examples, particularly pEnd.
I think this will make a significant difference to your application.
John L.
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:32:16 -0600
From: Tim Docker t...@dockerz.net
Subject: memory slop (was: Using the GHC heap profiler)
To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
