This is a fascinating argument for the Haskell platform vs. a port-directed
installation system.
Consider if you wanted to customize GHC or another Haskell environment to an
embedded system (e.g., prototype embedded flight software for a space
vehicle)? What would the bare minimum core be? How
function that can easily be used. Well, problem's solved but I don't know
how it works and I don't know whether it performs well or hwo to improve it.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Cutting-down-GHC-installation-to-bare-minimum-tp28374093p28385320.html
Sent from the Haskell
://old.nabble.com/Cutting-down-GHC-installation-to-bare-minimum-tp28374093p28374093.html
Sent from the Haskell - Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http
leledumbo wrote:
I notice that many of the installed libs aren't required for learning
Haskell. What libs are required so I can get the bare minimum version of
GHC?
For most people, the recommended approach is to install
the Haskell Platform. This is not a minimal setup - it includes
packages
I agree with the answer that Yitz gave, but let me frame it in a bit of context:
Many people's idea of a programming language is Python, and within 12 minutes
of settling in to a new language they're going to wonder how to match a regular
expression to a string, or download a web page, and
