how can I convince the Language.Haskell.Parser to accept GHC Haskell
(i.e., -fglasgow-exts, e.g. for existential types)
You use my haskell-src-exts package instead. :-)
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/haskell-src-exts-0.3.3
Cheers,
/Niklas
Dear all,
how can I convince the Language.Haskell.Parser to accept GHC Haskell
(i.e., -fglasgow-exts, e.g. for existential types)
or: how can I convince the GHC API loader
to parse a module from a string (not from a file)?
Any hints appreciated, Johannes.
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/haskell-src-exts-0.3.3
interesting, I'll look into that.
* it's not exactly a drop-in replacement for Language.Haskell.* ?
(HsNewTypeDecl is different?)
* for the others, number of constructor arguments does not match, e.g.
* it's not exactly a drop-in replacement for Language.Haskell.* ?
(HsNewTypeDecl is different?)
* for the others, number of constructor arguments does not match, e.g.
`HsConDecl' should have 2 arguments, but has been given 3
Indeed it is like you say, these are pragmatic choices. The
general question
* is there any parser that keeps comments
(i.e. makes AST nodes from them)? what parser does Haddock use?
you might want to add your voice and cc to Ticket #1886 ;-)
GHC API should preserve and provide access to comments
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1886
claus
GHC API should preserve and provide access to comments
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1886
What does this lead to?
Introspection? So you can get haddock comments from ghci?
This would be interesting
Marc Weber
___
Glasgow-haskell-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Introspection? So you can get haddock comments from ghci?
see also http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2168
best regards, j.w.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
