Please please consider Mercurial if migration from darcs is inevitable :)
P.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Pavel Perikov peri...@gmail.com wrote:
Please please consider Mercurial if migration from darcs is inevitable :)
While Mercurial is a fine choice, I think there are more Haskellers
that use Git than Mercurial. Probably because GitHub is such an
awesome service.
On 10.01.2011, at 16:40, Johan Tibell wrote:
While Mercurial is a fine choice, I think there are more Haskellers
that use Git than Mercurial. Probably because GitHub is such an
awesome service.
Interesting. It will be great to see any numbers (really, just curious).
bitbucket seems to be ok
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Pavel Perikov peri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10.01.2011, at 16:40, Johan Tibell wrote:
While Mercurial is a fine choice, I think there are more Haskellers
that use Git than Mercurial. Probably because GitHub is such an
awesome service.
Interesting. It will be
On 10.01.2011, at 18:59, Johan Tibell wrote:
I've just observed what other Haskellers talk about
and where I usually find projects (when they are not in Darcs). We
could probably pull the numbers of Hackage.
Probably most valuable are the opinions of GHC development team of course :)
Git
On 10.01.2011, at 19:29, Johan Tibell wrote:
I'm
not trying to get into a Git vs Mercurial argument here. I have more
important things to do, like writing code. :)
Absolutely true :)
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Pavel Perikov peri...@gmail.com wrote:
Please please consider Mercurial if migration from darcs is inevitable :)
For what it's worth, Mercurial generally interoperates quite well with git
and github, using the hg-git plugin. As a longtime Mercurial user and an
